2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis of fluid percussion model of brain injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent in silico modeling of lFPI included a three-layer hexahedral, element-based skull module with varying Young modulus for each layer. 72 The model used a uniformly thick skull and predicted significant strain in regions surrounding the initial injury site that dissipate through the brain, in contrast to our neuropathology results and those of others (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Recent in silico modeling of lFPI included a three-layer hexahedral, element-based skull module with varying Young modulus for each layer. 72 The model used a uniformly thick skull and predicted significant strain in regions surrounding the initial injury site that dissipate through the brain, in contrast to our neuropathology results and those of others (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In laboratory closed-head impact tests, no matter where the animal heads were hit, the induced linear and rotational kinematics were the culprits that induced brain responses and led to brain damage, especially for mild TBI impacts for which skull deformation is limited. Meanwhile, open-skull laboratory neurotrauma loadings such as CCI and FPI are still widely used, for which part of the skull was removed and mouse cortical brain could experience strains up to 0.3 and higher in CCI (6) and around 0.10 in FPI (7). The focus on rotational kinematics in this study was consistent with mouse model such as CHIMERA ( 9) and swine models, both focusing on inducing head rotations (51,52).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Openskull TBI using the cortical impactor has been popular as it allows direct loading to the brain tissue and induces high brain strain above 0.30 to the underlying cortical layers (6). Open-skull TBI using the FPI also induces high strain up to ~ 0.1 and high pressure of approximately 180 kPa (7). Despite the greater convenience of open skull TBI, closed-head TBI is considered more clinically relevant because it does not require a craniotomy (8) and real-world mTBI/concussions happen with closed-skull conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this model, it appears that the applied mechanical force increased strain and stress on neuronal tissue, with the likely consequence of tissue forced against different parts of the skull. Recent in silico modeling of lFPI included a 3-layer hexahedral, element-based skull module with varying Young modulus for each layer [65]. The uniformly thick skull appeared not to influence the results, which showed local forces at the site of injury and secondarily at the ventral aspect of the brain, as proposed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%