2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis of impending femoral neck fractures: The role of percutaneous cement augmentation for osteolytic lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They suggest augmentation of the postero-superior aspect of the greater trochanter and the neck areas close to the cortical shell. This is in agreement with the recent experimental findings of Palumbo et al (2014). By closer examination, one can notice the thicker augmentation in the superior of the neck, compared to the inferior aspect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They suggest augmentation of the postero-superior aspect of the greater trochanter and the neck areas close to the cortical shell. This is in agreement with the recent experimental findings of Palumbo et al (2014). By closer examination, one can notice the thicker augmentation in the superior of the neck, compared to the inferior aspect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A recent study showed that, for single-legged stance loading condition, augmentation of superior and inferior of the femoral neck close to the cortex results in the most favorable outcome (Palumbo et al, 2014), which is consistent with what optimizations suggested in the current study. However, backward falls or even daily activities such as walking can cause fracture in osteoporotic hips.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although theoretically more likely for InF/PF than ImF, we did not encounter any clinically relevant leakage in either group similar to other series [30]. Additionally, several biomechanical and clinical studies suggest that cementoplasty may enhance screw fixation and optimise biomechanics [25][26][27][28][29]; and all our unfavourable local cement augmentation evolution rated at imaging follow-up occurred in non-cemented cases. Although definitive proof is lacking [24], it is probably an effective and safe option to optimise screw fixation with PMMA injection when it is performed under continuous fluoroscopic guidance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Conversely, screw fixation is commonly used by orthopaedic surgeons in patients unsuitable for invasive surgery in a variety of locations and settings [14,22,23,32,42]. In particular, several clinical and biomechanical studies support the use of an ''inverted triangle'' screw-configuration with/without cement augmentation to provide intramedullary reinforcement in proximal femoral neck fractures [22,23,25,43]. The PIGSF technique described herein and elsewhere [16] is comparable to existing surgical techniques, and probably represents the most appropriate procedure for most lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%