2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical analysis of peri‑implant fractures in short versus long cephalomedullary implants following pertrochanteric fracture consolidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 11 , 12 Moreover, from a biomechanical perspective, the risk of secondary periprosthetic fractures after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric fractures is similar when using short or long nails. 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 11 , 12 Moreover, from a biomechanical perspective, the risk of secondary periprosthetic fractures after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric fractures is similar when using short or long nails. 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Moreover, from a biomechanical perspective, the risk of secondary periprosthetic fractures after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric fractures is similar when using short or long nails. 13 Postoperative cut out of the lag screw was the unsolved problem, and the occurrence was reported to be 1.0 to 6.9% in the meta-analysis. 14 No significant differences concerning changes in tip to apex distance of the lag screw and angulation of the fracture line after cyclic loading were observed among groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peri-implant fractures around the tip of nail as well as diaphyseal fracture risk and anterior cortical penetration are well known risk factors of short PFN [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a biomechanical perspective, investigating short and long nails following pertrochanteric fracture consolidation was reported by Breceda et al (2020) and concluded that the nail design does not have significant effects for high age groups (83.4 ± 7.7 years old). Nevertheless, it is important to point that their work neglects the effect of the demographical factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%