Abstract:Considering that there was no statistically significant difference in torque to failure between the two groups of tibiae, the site for tibial bone graft can be selected based on the shape of the cortical graft necessary for each specific surgery.
“…We chose this design to obtain torsional strength data for intact specimens, which was not obtained in a previous study using the same model. 13 We tested the smallest and largest size graft used in practice by the senior author to determine whether strength differed between the graft and intact groups and between the two graft groups. In specimens from which graft was to be taken, a rectangular cortical strut graft randomly assigned measuring 1.5 × 2 cm or 1.5 × 6 cm was obtained from the medial cortex 1 cm dorsal to the tibial crest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drill holes were connected using a high-speed microsagittal saw with precautions taken not to overcut the holes as described previously. 13 Each graft was then lifted out of the tibia using a 0.25-in osteotome. Both ends of each tibia were cross-drilled with Kirschner wires for testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing was done as described previously. 13 Both ends of each tibia were mounted in fiberglass resin within PVC pipe sections, and torsional stability was provided by the Kirschner wires. An MTS 858 Mini Bionix servohydraulic test frame (MTS Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, MN) was used for loading (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,5,6,8,10,12,16,17,19 In orthopedic surgeries, especially those involving the lower extremity, ease of harvest and availability of a proximal tibial strut graft may offer a useful alternative for cortical autograft. 3,11,13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent biomechanical study noted no difference in torque to failure for tibial specimens used as donor sites for grafts taken from the tibial crest or off the crest. 13 However, there is no point of reference in the literature indicating how much cortex can be safely removed from the tibia and to what degree the removal of cortex weakens the tibia.…”
Though this study cannot be extrapolated directly to the clinical setting, the longer graft tested in this study may raise concerns regarding the strength of the tibia after graft removal.
“…We chose this design to obtain torsional strength data for intact specimens, which was not obtained in a previous study using the same model. 13 We tested the smallest and largest size graft used in practice by the senior author to determine whether strength differed between the graft and intact groups and between the two graft groups. In specimens from which graft was to be taken, a rectangular cortical strut graft randomly assigned measuring 1.5 × 2 cm or 1.5 × 6 cm was obtained from the medial cortex 1 cm dorsal to the tibial crest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drill holes were connected using a high-speed microsagittal saw with precautions taken not to overcut the holes as described previously. 13 Each graft was then lifted out of the tibia using a 0.25-in osteotome. Both ends of each tibia were cross-drilled with Kirschner wires for testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing was done as described previously. 13 Both ends of each tibia were mounted in fiberglass resin within PVC pipe sections, and torsional stability was provided by the Kirschner wires. An MTS 858 Mini Bionix servohydraulic test frame (MTS Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, MN) was used for loading (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,5,6,8,10,12,16,17,19 In orthopedic surgeries, especially those involving the lower extremity, ease of harvest and availability of a proximal tibial strut graft may offer a useful alternative for cortical autograft. 3,11,13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent biomechanical study noted no difference in torque to failure for tibial specimens used as donor sites for grafts taken from the tibial crest or off the crest. 13 However, there is no point of reference in the literature indicating how much cortex can be safely removed from the tibia and to what degree the removal of cortex weakens the tibia.…”
Though this study cannot be extrapolated directly to the clinical setting, the longer graft tested in this study may raise concerns regarding the strength of the tibia after graft removal.
Introduction Since the nature of complications following the harvesting of bone from the tibia in children is not well documented in the literature, we undertook this study in order to determine the frequency and nature of donor site complications following the harvesting of large cortical strut grafts from the tibial diaphysis in children. Materials and methods During the past 19 years, tibial cortical grafts were harvested from 47 children on 77 separate occasions, mainly for the treatment of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. The technique of graft harvesting was identical in every case. Case records of these 47 children were reviewed. Forty of these children were reviewed at a mean period of 5.5 years.Results No immediate post-operative complications were noted and, at follow-up, apart from mild bowing of the anterior cortex of the tibia, no deformities were encountered. The tibial cortex reformed completely and this facilitated repeat graft harvesting when required. The only major complication was a stress fracture of the tibia in one boy. Conclusion Harvesting cortical bone graft from the tibia is simple and is fraught with negligible morbidity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.