2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10228263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Analysis of Two Types of Osseointegrated Transfemoral Prosthesis

Abstract: In the last two decades, osseointegrated prostheses have been shown to be a good alternative for lower limb amputees experiencing complications in using a traditional socket-type prosthesis; however, restraining biomechanical issues, such as peri-prosthetic bone fractures or loosening, are present. To better understand and overcome these limiting issues, and thus reduce the number of implant failures, many studies have investigated the stress distribution on bone and implant during normal daily activities. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(81 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reported in the literature [ 4 , 24 ], custom specific knee finite element models (FEM) has recently been developed, both in clinical applications and in the process of medical devices design [ 13 , 23 ], to investigate native and replaced knee joint kinematics and kinetics [ 6 , 15 , 18 ]. These models represent a valid alternative to in-vivo or experimental assessments since they were able to provide results comparable to those two methods while maintaining lower cost in comparison [ 2 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in the literature [ 4 , 24 ], custom specific knee finite element models (FEM) has recently been developed, both in clinical applications and in the process of medical devices design [ 13 , 23 ], to investigate native and replaced knee joint kinematics and kinetics [ 6 , 15 , 18 ]. These models represent a valid alternative to in-vivo or experimental assessments since they were able to provide results comparable to those two methods while maintaining lower cost in comparison [ 2 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young's modulus (GPa) Poisson's Ratio Cortical bone 17.6 0.3 Spongy bone 13 0.36 Titanium alloy 110 0.33 An appropriate contact model that can represent the implant boundary conditions is important for the accuracy of the finite element (FE) analysis. For the OPL and ILP implants, friction is the main mechanism for connecting bone and implants after the first surgery, whereas bonded contact is commonly used in many FE simulations [1,8,9,16,29]. There is no sliding and separation of the contact elements in bonded contact.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A two-stage surgical protocol and rehabilitation plan can help patients gain implant stability gradually [16]. In the first stage, the implant will be hammered into the bone remnant and the wound is closed using a stump pressure bandage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, numerical simulation of the in vivo biomechanical responses by using finite element analysis (FEA) becomes a more effective approach [ 21 - 23 ] . FEA can provide the mechanical responses of bone tissue [ 24 - 26 ] and prostheses [ 27 - 30 ] under various mechanical environments, which in turn is valuable to guide the design and fabrication of prostheses. Despite the wide applications of FEA, few studies were reported on its application in the clinical design of patient-specific 3D-printed porous tantalum prostheses, especially in the evaluation of the designed prostheses from the viewpoint of bone biomechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%