2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical and histological evaluation of four different implant macrogeometries in the early osseointegration process: An in vivo animal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, Gehrke et al [32] analyzed the effect of four different implant macrogeometries on early bone formation in an animal model. Among the three types of implants studied-cylindrical-conical, tapered, and tapered implants with healing chambers-higher values of ISQ, BIC, and other histological parameters were observed when compared to cylindrical implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, Gehrke et al [32] analyzed the effect of four different implant macrogeometries on early bone formation in an animal model. Among the three types of implants studied-cylindrical-conical, tapered, and tapered implants with healing chambers-higher values of ISQ, BIC, and other histological parameters were observed when compared to cylindrical implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the Biomed and Osstem implantation systems, the assimilation rate was lower but was also statistically significant. Previous experimental studies (histological [ 17 ] and biochemical [ 18 ] and X-ray analyses [ 19 ]) have also shown how the degree of osseointegration depends on various methods of implantation systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the relatively high number of experimental and clinical investigations on this topic (histological [ 17 ], biochemical [ 18 ], and X-ray analyses [ 19 ]), it is currently impossible to make a definite conclusion regarding the kinetics or dynamics of the osseointegration of an implant with the jawbone structure. In our opinion, to remove this blind spot, it is necessary to involve a combination of proven analytical methods to characterize the bone tissue structure after implantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals received anesthetic procedures and pre- and postoperative medication following protocols used in previous studies by our research group. 1,2 First, an incision was made to the bone level and a total flap was opened, exposing the dorsal calvarium bone. In each animal, two bone defects were created (right and left sides of the midline) in the posterior (dorsal) portion of the skull, in which the total bone thickness was removed using a 6.5 mm external diameter trephine (Hager & Meisinger GmbH, Neuss, Germany), under intense irrigation with saline solution at room temperature (23 ± 2ºC).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their predictability, dental implants have become a safe alternative for the rehabilitation of missing teeth; despite their success rate being quite high, micro-, and macrogeometric alterations are continually proposed. [1][2][3] However, for the installation of these implants, it is essential that there is adequate bone structure, which is normally affected after tooth loss, as the alveolar bone loses a large part of its volume during the healing process. To recover the bone volume needed for implant placement, regenerative bone grafts are often used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%