2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical assessment of composite versus metallic intramedullary nailing system in femoral shaft fractures: A finite element study

Abstract: Our results suggest that the composite nail can provide a preferred mechanical environment for healing, particularly in transverse shaft fractures. This may help bioengineers better understand the biomechanics of fracture healing, and aid in the design of effective implants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This, combined with attachment of interlocking screws to the bone fragments, guarantees that the majority of the load is supported by the nail, which shields the bone from the stress and reduces the stimulus required for proper healing to occur. Such effect was perceived as a potential problem and was assumed to cause delayed recovery and nonunion cases . In an attempt to reduce the stress‐shielding effect and promote healing, Grosse and Kempf emphasized nail dynamization , where a fixed end is responsible for ensuring fracture rotational stability, while the opposite extremity is free to slide slightly inside the bone .…”
Section: The Evolutionary Biomechanical Landmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This, combined with attachment of interlocking screws to the bone fragments, guarantees that the majority of the load is supported by the nail, which shields the bone from the stress and reduces the stimulus required for proper healing to occur. Such effect was perceived as a potential problem and was assumed to cause delayed recovery and nonunion cases . In an attempt to reduce the stress‐shielding effect and promote healing, Grosse and Kempf emphasized nail dynamization , where a fixed end is responsible for ensuring fracture rotational stability, while the opposite extremity is free to slide slightly inside the bone .…”
Section: The Evolutionary Biomechanical Landmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to reduce the stress‐shielding effect and promote healing, Grosse and Kempf emphasized nail dynamization , where a fixed end is responsible for ensuring fracture rotational stability, while the opposite extremity is free to slide slightly inside the bone . In the materials field, a strong novelty was also introduced in the 1990s with the adoption of titanium, a new material competing with the until then commonly used AISI 136 LVM ASTM F138 stainless steel (generally known as medical‐grade stainless steel) . Today, both materials are widely accepted; however, there is a preferential tendency for titanium alloy owing to its attractive mechanical properties (see Table ), such as Young's modulus closer to the intact diaphyseal cortical bone, higher fatigue strength and yield strength, and the fact that it is biocompatible and shows less magnetic resonance imaging interference than that observed for stainless steel implants .…”
Section: The Evolutionary Biomechanical Landmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations