2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06069-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical assessment of disease outcome in surgical interventions for medial meniscal posterior root tears: a finite element analysis

Abstract: Background The adverse consequences of medial meniscus posterior root tears have become increasingly familiar to surgeons, and treatment strategies have become increasingly abundant. In this paper, the finite element gait analysis method was used to explore the differences in the biomechanical characteristics of the knee joint under different conditions. Methods Based on CT computed tomography and MR images, (I) an intact knee (IK) model with bone,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another notable finding of this study was that the cartilage regeneration of the MFC in the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair group was superior to that in the OWHTO alone group, regardless of whether microfracture was performed. Biomechanical studies have shown that peak contact pressure is significantly lower in patients with repaired MMPRT than in those with MMPRT [34,35]. Similar to our findings, a previous cadaveric biomechanical study reported that MMPRT repair decreased contact pressure and increased contact area irrespective of whether OWHTO was performed [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another notable finding of this study was that the cartilage regeneration of the MFC in the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair group was superior to that in the OWHTO alone group, regardless of whether microfracture was performed. Biomechanical studies have shown that peak contact pressure is significantly lower in patients with repaired MMPRT than in those with MMPRT [34,35]. Similar to our findings, a previous cadaveric biomechanical study reported that MMPRT repair decreased contact pressure and increased contact area irrespective of whether OWHTO was performed [34].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Through comparison with previous literature on finite element studies of the knee joint [ 14 , 15 ], it was found that the results of shear stress and compressive stress of femoral cartilage, meniscus and tibial cartilage were similar, thus verifying the validity of this model (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Mootanah et al 2014 ; Steineman et al 2020 ; Shriram et al 2021 ), or on cartilage pressure (e.g. D'Lima et al 2009 ; Khoshgoftar et al 2015 ; Xu et al 2022 ) but may not be accurate for both types of outputs. Further, while validation studies often replicate an equivalent experimental (or computational) protocol, they often do not report on how sensitive the model outputs are to its inputs or which assumptions can be modified and still produce a “valid” outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%