2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05384-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis

Abstract: The surgeon general of the USA defines osteoporosis as "a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength, predisposing to an increased risk of fracture." Measuring bone strength, Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT), namely, finite element analysis of a patient's clinical-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan, is now available in the USA as a Medicare screening benefit for osteoporosis diagnostic testing. Helping to address under-diagnosis of osteoporosis, BCT can be applied "oppor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(216 reference statements)
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(5) Biomechanical computed tomography analysis (BCT), a generic name for finite element analysis of clinical-resolution CT scans, has been proposed as one possible noninvasive approach to improve the accessibility and performance of fracture risk assessment. (6)(7)(8) Bone strength estimated by BCT has shown better performance in predicting femoral failure load than DXA aBMD, or quantitative computed tomography (QCT) models in human cadaver studies. (9) Fragile bone strength (spine: women ≤4500 N, men ≤6500 N; hip: women ≤3000 N, men ≤3500 N) measured using routine abdominal or pelvic CT scans has shown comparable performance to DXA for predicting spine or hip fractures with higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) Biomechanical computed tomography analysis (BCT), a generic name for finite element analysis of clinical-resolution CT scans, has been proposed as one possible noninvasive approach to improve the accessibility and performance of fracture risk assessment. (6)(7)(8) Bone strength estimated by BCT has shown better performance in predicting femoral failure load than DXA aBMD, or quantitative computed tomography (QCT) models in human cadaver studies. (9) Fragile bone strength (spine: women ≤4500 N, men ≤6500 N; hip: women ≤3000 N, men ≤3500 N) measured using routine abdominal or pelvic CT scans has shown comparable performance to DXA for predicting spine or hip fractures with higher sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that the IP analysis is not suitable for analyzing scans other than those obtained at 120 kVp. Opportunistic vBMD measurement with a CT-based method, both in MECT and DECT mode, is useful, with the potential to contribute to an earlier discovery of osteoporosis without increased radiation exposure (3,4,12,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). However, the BMD values determined by different software programs in the same patients across different machines should be comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various computed tomography (CT)-based methods can be used to potentially improve bone quality assessment and make the diagnosis process in FLSs more effective (4,9,10). FLSs could perform opportunistic volumetric BMD (vBMD) assessment using CT scans conducted at the time of fracture occurrence (i.e., when detecting a vertebral fracture using abdominal or thoracic CT scans) as well as identifying high-risk individuals during opportunistic screening when investigating patients for other diagnoses (3,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). It is important that these CT-based methods are shown to be reliable and stable across various software programs, CT machines and scan protocols (i.e., not only protocols specific to skeletal imaging).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with painful OVCFs, treated by PVP at our hospital between July 2018 and December 2019, were included in our study. Inclusion criteria for the study were as follows: (1) age >60 years; (2) osteoporosis diagnosed by measuring bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), with BMD T-score ≤ − 2.5 [17]; 3 A total of 155 patients (27 males, 128 females) with a mean age of 77.2 ± 8.9 years (range, 60-97 years) were enrolled in the study. We divided them into two groups according to the puncture approach.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%