2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical effects of cement distribution in the fractured area on osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stabilization of the fractured area and restora- (25). This hypothesis has been supported by biomechanical studies, which indicated that PVP generally restored or increased vertebral strength and stiffness relative to pre-fracture values and likely provided stabilization of the vertebral body so as to prevent micromotion of the fractured area (26)(27)(28). In our present study, based on cement distribution in the fractured area observed in postoperative CT scan, the cohort was categorized into Sufficient Group, consisting of those with sufficient cement distribution in the fractured area, and Insufficient Group, composed of those with ICD, and a higher degree of pain relief was found in the Sufficient Group than in the Insufficient Group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Stabilization of the fractured area and restora- (25). This hypothesis has been supported by biomechanical studies, which indicated that PVP generally restored or increased vertebral strength and stiffness relative to pre-fracture values and likely provided stabilization of the vertebral body so as to prevent micromotion of the fractured area (26)(27)(28). In our present study, based on cement distribution in the fractured area observed in postoperative CT scan, the cohort was categorized into Sufficient Group, consisting of those with sufficient cement distribution in the fractured area, and Insufficient Group, composed of those with ICD, and a higher degree of pain relief was found in the Sufficient Group than in the Insufficient Group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the neutral position, exion and extension, lateral bending and axial rotation position, the vertebral showed similar maximum von Mises stress, and the maximum stress of the cortical bone and the lower endplate adjacent to the vertebral body L1 increased signi cantly; In the upright, exion, extension, and lateral bending (left and right) positions, the maximum von Mises stress of the vertebral increases with the increase of the elastic modulus of the cement. The nite element analysis of patients with OVCFs after PVA of T12 fractured vertebral suggests that insu cient bone cement and asymmetric distribution may lead to a maximum displacement of the vertebral body, and a signi cant increase in maximum von Mises stress of cancellous and cortical bone, which may lead to re-fracture of the T12 vertebral and fracture of the adjacent vertebral [36]. This nite element analysis did not study the different heights of OVCFs after PVA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If the cement touches the upper and lower endplates at the same time, it will prompt 8-12 times and signi cantly improve the stress transmission [17]. In Kim [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were 26 males and 111 females, with an average age of 69 ± 7.0 years old. The average follow-up time was 15.3 ± 6.3 (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) months.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%