2018
DOI: 10.1177/0363546517752673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Single- Versus Double-Tunnel Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction With Acromioclavicular Stabilization for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

Abstract: This study suggests that the ST CC ligament reconstruction has biomechanical properties equivalent to the DT CC ligament reconstruction with less theoretical risk of clavicle fracture.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In a biomechanical study by Beitzel et al [13], there was no difference in stability between the single and double device; nevertheless, the coracoid fracture incidence was much higher with the double device. Likewise, a recent study demonstrated that single tunnel reconstruction demonstrates similar biomechanical properties to the intact state and double tunnel reconstruction [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a biomechanical study by Beitzel et al [13], there was no difference in stability between the single and double device; nevertheless, the coracoid fracture incidence was much higher with the double device. Likewise, a recent study demonstrated that single tunnel reconstruction demonstrates similar biomechanical properties to the intact state and double tunnel reconstruction [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Mean time from injury to surgery was 6.8 ± 3.8 days (range, 2-14). The mean time to return to work was 11.2 ± 2.9 weeks (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. When trauma mechanisms are examined, 15 patients were injured while doing sports, 14 patients were injured after a traffic accident, 5 patients were injured after falling from height and 2 patients were injured during a fight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 14 In that context, some authors preconized the use of a single-tunnel technique because, despite the high success rates of double-tunnel anatomical techniques, it can be a more suitable option to minimize fracture risk. 15 , 16 , 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Producers of implants used in everyday orthopedic and traumatologic practice meet this demand. Unfortunately, the proposed stabilization methods of the disruption of tissue continuity or the reconstruction of the bony tissue loss and especially of the damaged soft tissues are often based on static mechanical studies that do not take into account the complexity or the specificity of individual patients [1][2][3]. Therefore, it is all the more crucial to work out strict recommendation criteria for the industryproposed implants.…”
Section: Krzysztof Gawedamentioning
confidence: 99%