2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 [1]. The nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and all other com-ponents in this model were considered as elastic material [18,19]. The cage screws were assumed as titanium material.…”
Section: Materials Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 [1]. The nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus, and all other com-ponents in this model were considered as elastic material [18,19]. The cage screws were assumed as titanium material.…”
Section: Materials Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven ligaments, including the anterior longitudinal ligament, posterior longitudinal ligament, ligamentum flavum, capsular ligament, interspinous ligament, intertransverse ligament, and supraspinal ligament, were modeled as hypoelastic, tension-only, truss elements. The material properties for bone, intervertebral discs, and ligaments were derived from the ligament stiffness data of previous studies and are shown in Table 1 ( Fagan et al, 2002 ; Jones and Wilcox, 2008 ; Wang B. et al, 2019 ; Hua et al, 2020 ). The finite element model of the T7−T11 thoracic spine segments is shown in Figure 2A .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), facet joint stress, and internal fixation device stress were calculated and analyzed to evaluate the biomechanical effect of different surgical approaches. Several previous studies indicated that FEA enabled the evaluation of the ROM and IDP of the adjacent segments to predict the risk factors of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical or lumbar surgeries ( Ke et al, 2019 ; Wang B. et al, 2019 ; Hua et al, 2020 ; Wong et al, 2020 ). However, the studies only focused on the postoperative effect of internal fixation to evaluate the biomechanical advantages and disadvantages of surgical treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nonfusion technique aims at preserving the range of motion (ROM) at the surgical level and delaying degeneration at adjacent levels. [13][14][15][16] To restore the physiological condition of the cervical spine after CDR, it is hypothesized that the cervical sagittal alignment parameters should be corrected to the normal level. However, most previous studies have only focused on describing the CL and FSUA values after CDR, and the other cervical sagittal alignment parameters have been rarely studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%