Biomechanical Evaluation of Dual Plate Configurations for Femoral Shaft Fracture Fixation

Abstract

Aim. This study aimed at comparing the mechanical properties of conventional and locking dual plates in adjacent and orthogonal orientations for the surgical fixation of transverse femoral shaft fractures. It also assessed the failure mechanics after dual adjacent and orthogonal locking plate removal. Methods. Thirty-two composite femurs were transversally osteotomized and randomly assigned for fixation with either dual locking or compression plates in an adjacent or orthogonal configuration. Sixteen specimens were preloaded axially to 20 N and single-leg stance loads were simulated. The remaining sixteen constructs were subjected to torsional loads of 10 Nm at a rate of 10 Nm/s in external and internal rotation of the femoral head in relation to the knee. Overall combined rotational stiffness was calculated. Eight different specimens with no osteotomy underwent the same experiments after dual locked plate removal and were tested to failure in combined eccentric axial and torsional modes. Data were statistically processed using a two-tailed t-test and one-way analysis of variance for the comparison of means between two or more groups, respectively. Results. Orthogonal constructs were statistically stiffer in axial loading compared to their adjacent counterparts in both conventional and locking configurations (p<0.001). Dual locking plates provided higher torsional stiffness than conventional ones within each plate orientation (p<0.01). Neither axial/torsional strength nor failure loads differed between constructs that had adjacent or orthogonal dual locking plates instrumented and then removed (p>0.05). Conclusions. In both orthogonal and adjacent orientations, double locking plates provide higher stability than their dual conventional counterparts. Orthogonal dual plate configuration is more stable and biomechanically superior to dual adjacent plating for constructs fixed with either standard compression or locking plates.

Spatial Bridge Locking Fixator versus Traditional Locking Plates in Treating AO/OTA 32‐A3.2 Fracture: Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Evaluation

“…The FEA results of the plate were similar to those of previous studies 21 . Furthermore, the biomechanical values in this study were similar to those recorded in previous studies involving plates 26 , 35 . It should also be stated that due to the barrier of the plate itself, the IFM below the plate was difficult to measure in the mechanical experiment.…”

MIPO For Complex Comminuted Bone Fractures in the Floating Knee IIC According Fraser: a Case Report

“…A decision on whether an additional medial plate should be added must be made during the operation. Double plating proved stronger than single lateral plate in biomechanical testing, but it was not superior to traditional lateral plating with respect to clinical outcomes (8)(9)(10) . In our patient, we decided not to add a medial plate for the following reasons: the single lateral locking plate was strong enough to maintain su cient stability to allow functionality after treatment.…”

Appropriateness of devices in the surgical treatment of femoral shaft fractures

“…In term of biomechanical advantages, few scientific works have focused attention on the advantages conferred by a configuration of double plating that is indicated in cases of marked comminution of the femoral shaft or very weak bone. Some studies, such as that of Gugala et al, believe that the orthogonality of the positioning of the screws in that configuration is more effective than other constructs 21,22 . To improve stability, in some conditions, such as pseudoarthrosis or osteoporosis, it is possible to stabilize the fracture through "biological" fixation.…”