1999
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199903000-00012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Evaluation of Fixation of Intra-Articular Fractures of the Distal Part of the Radius in Cadavera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Forces were consistent with previously published biomechanical testing of distal radius fixation and studies demonstrating that light active motion of the wrist and wrist with finger motion does not exceed 250N. (12,15,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) Gondusky et al and Weninger et al identified in prior distal radius mechanical testing that all changes attributable to cyclic loading occurred in the first 200-500 cycles, thus we deemed 1,000 cycles sufficient to condition the constructs. (11,(13)(14)(15)(16) Destructive testing was completed to determine load (N) to clinical failure which was defined as 2mm of displacement at the osteotomy gap, (10) and subsequent catastrophic failure, defined as complete closure of the 1 cm osteotomy gap and or fracture.…”
Section: Biomechanical Testingsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Forces were consistent with previously published biomechanical testing of distal radius fixation and studies demonstrating that light active motion of the wrist and wrist with finger motion does not exceed 250N. (12,15,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) Gondusky et al and Weninger et al identified in prior distal radius mechanical testing that all changes attributable to cyclic loading occurred in the first 200-500 cycles, thus we deemed 1,000 cycles sufficient to condition the constructs. (11,(13)(14)(15)(16) Destructive testing was completed to determine load (N) to clinical failure which was defined as 2mm of displacement at the osteotomy gap, (10) and subsequent catastrophic failure, defined as complete closure of the 1 cm osteotomy gap and or fracture.…”
Section: Biomechanical Testingsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[6][7][8][9][10] Remodellable bone cements such as Norian SRS can be used in a similar way to provide immediate stability and to shorten the length of immobilisation, with the added advantages of availability, biological acceptance and high compressive strength. [15][16][17][18][19] The choice of conservative treatment for the control group in our study is debatable. Immobilisation in a cast is known to be unsuccessful for unstable fractures of the distal radius, 1 but other techniques including open bone grafting and bridging external fixation give similar functional results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…15 In a cadaver study, Norian SRS provided more stability than Kirschner wires for intraarticular fractures of the distal radius. 16 Two short clinical series have shown that this product can be safely used for these fractures 17,18 and one study has compared Norian SRS with external fixation. 19 A comparison of SRS with conservative treatment has not previously been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a mechanical study by Stankewich et al (1996), augmentation with calcium phosphate cement provided enhanced stiffness, stability and strength of fixed femoral neck fractures. When resorbable substances are used, the idea is that the initial reinforcement will be followed by progressive resorption over timeassociated with a simultaneous increase in structural support provided by the healing bone (Witschger et al 1991, Constantz et al 1995, Kopylov et al 1996, Stankewich et al 1996, Mainil et al 1997, Moore et al 1997, Frankenburg et al 1998, Goodman et al 1998, Knaack et al 1998, Yetkinler et al 1999, Larsson and Bauer 2002.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%