2002
DOI: 10.1007/s007760200117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical evaluation of reconstructed lumbosacral spine after total sacrectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sacrum is a unique structure that connects the lumbar spine and pelvis, and although challenging, reconstruction after a sacrectomy is mandatory in some cases [20,21]. Once postoperative SSI occurs, the decision whether to remove the instrumentation is a dilemma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sacrum is a unique structure that connects the lumbar spine and pelvis, and although challenging, reconstruction after a sacrectomy is mandatory in some cases [20,21]. Once postoperative SSI occurs, the decision whether to remove the instrumentation is a dilemma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated that a negative surgical margin is the most important predictor of the local recurrence rate and survival [3,12,13,44]; however, wide resection is not achieved in 35% to 75% of patients undergoing surgery for this diagnosis [42]. Surgery in this anatomic site is challenging as a result of the complexity of the pelvic anatomy, adjacent visceral and vascular structures, and frequent compromise of spinopelvic continuity [12,17,32]. Surgeons often face a difficult choice between maximizing the preservation of function and achieving an adequate surgical margin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murakami et al 15 reported a technique based on dual sacral rods that they called the triangular frame technique, which decreased the stress on the spinal rod but appeared to demonstrate increased stress at the sacral rods. Kawahara et al 13 biomechanically compared 3 techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%