2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Evaluation of Stand-Alone Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Under 3 Different Bone Mineral Density Conditions: A Finite Element Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Severe osteoporosis leads to stress fractures, screw loosening, and internal fixation failure after spinal surgery [ 26 ]. A biomechanical finite element analysis showed that with the increase in the degree of osteoporosis, the maximum stress on the upper and lower endplates of the fusion segment increased significantly, thus increasing the potential risk of implant subsidence [ 27 ]. In our study, the HU values of the upper and lower vertebral body and endplate in the subsidence group were significantly lower than those in the non-subsidence group, and those results indicate that BMD is a very important factor in TMC subsidence after ACCF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe osteoporosis leads to stress fractures, screw loosening, and internal fixation failure after spinal surgery [ 26 ]. A biomechanical finite element analysis showed that with the increase in the degree of osteoporosis, the maximum stress on the upper and lower endplates of the fusion segment increased significantly, thus increasing the potential risk of implant subsidence [ 27 ]. In our study, the HU values of the upper and lower vertebral body and endplate in the subsidence group were significantly lower than those in the non-subsidence group, and those results indicate that BMD is a very important factor in TMC subsidence after ACCF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simulating osteoporosis, the elastic modulus of cancellous bone is set to reduce by 66%, and the elastic modulus of cortical bone, endplate, and posterior elements is set to reduce by 33%, while the elastic modulus of other structures remains unchanged. With this configuration, finite element analysis discovered that as the degree of osteoporosis increased, the maximum stress on the upper and lower en-plates of the fusion segment increased significantly, increasing the potential risk of implant subsidence in OLIF ( Wang et al, 2021b ). Furthermore, the surgeon must consider the limitations of the stand-alone (SA) and lateral plate-screw (LPS) fixations in OLIF, which may not provide adequate stability for osteoporotic patients ( Bereczki et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2021b ).…”
Section: Fea Advances In Icsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this configuration, finite element analysis discovered that as the degree of osteoporosis increased, the maximum stress on the upper and lower en-plates of the fusion segment increased significantly, increasing the potential risk of implant subsidence in OLIF ( Wang et al, 2021b ). Furthermore, the surgeon must consider the limitations of the stand-alone (SA) and lateral plate-screw (LPS) fixations in OLIF, which may not provide adequate stability for osteoporotic patients ( Bereczki et al, 2021 ; Wang et al, 2021b ). Under whole-body vibration (WBV), the osteoporosis of the fused vertebrae may make the adjacent segments more unstable, increasing the risk of adjacent segment disease, subsidence, cage failure, rod failure, and lumbar instability ( Wang and Guo, 2020 ).…”
Section: Fea Advances In Icsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the prevalence of osteoporosis has increased dramatically among the elderly in recent years, and an increasing number of patients requiring lumbar interbody fusion suffer from osteoporosis [ 16 ]. Previous studies reported that osteoporosis significantly altered the normal biomechanics of the lumbar spine [ 17 ] and showed a higher risk of fracture, internal fixation failure, and scaffold subsidence [ 18 , 19 ]. However, according to the existing literature, the biomechanics of lateral scaffolds with various materials were not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%