2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3533-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical evaluation of the Facet Wedge: a refined technique for facet fixation

Abstract: Facet Wedge offers a novel posterior approach in achieving primary stability in lumbar spinal fixation. The results of the present study showed that the Facet Wedge has a comparable primary stability to pedicle screws and potential advantages over translaminar screws.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-facet joint implants (wedge body/spacers) inserted into the facet joint space to engage the opposing joint surfaces can provide necessary distraction for stabilization (Figure 3d ) (132). The implants could also improve rotational stability (133). A clinical study reported an excellent outcome for 25 out of 36 patients (134).…”
Section: Facet Joint Fusion Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra-facet joint implants (wedge body/spacers) inserted into the facet joint space to engage the opposing joint surfaces can provide necessary distraction for stabilization (Figure 3d ) (132). The implants could also improve rotational stability (133). A clinical study reported an excellent outcome for 25 out of 36 patients (134).…”
Section: Facet Joint Fusion Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously their application has to be evaluated on the basis of a careful preoperative radiological planning. Up to date there aren't in literature clinical trials about the effective of this technique [17][18][19]. The biomechanical concept of this device, the possibility of implanting in percutaneous technique and in combined instrumentation with anterior cages or different posterior fusion techniques, could reveal that this technique might be an effective and feasible alternative which needs to be addressed in further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical and clinical trials confirmed low injury rate, relative simplicity and significantly lower risks of damaging the spinal canal content as compared to bilateral transpedicular stabilization, with fixation rigidity remaining comparable [25,26].…”
Section: Excellentmentioning
confidence: 99%