The proof of the reliability of a numerical model is becoming of paramount importance in the era of in silico clinical trials. When dealing with a coronary stenting procedure, the virtual scenario should be able to replicate the real device, passing through the different stages of the procedure, which has to maintain the atherosclerotic vessel opened.Nevertheless, most of the published studies adopted commercially resembling geometries and generic material parameters, without a specific validation of the employed numerical models.In this work, a workflow for the generation and validation of the computational model of a coronary stent was proposed. Possible sources of variability in the results, such as the inter-batches variability in the material properties and the choice of proper simulation strategies, were accounted for and discussed. Then, a group of in vitro tests, representative of the device intended use was used as a comparator to validate the model. The free expansion simulation, which is the most used simulation in the literature, was shown to be only partially useful for stent model validation purposes. On the other hand, the choice of proper additional experiments, as the suggested uniaxial tensile tests on the stent and deployment tests into a deformable tube, could provide further suitable information to prove the efficacy of the numerical approach.