2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical running gait assessments across prevalent adolescent musculoskeletal injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[26][27][28] Previous studies have identified distinct gait patterns among adolescent runners compared to previous findings among adult runners, particularly with higher peak vertical ground reaction forces, 29 varying foot strike types, longer stride lengths, and decreased step lengths. 28,29 These innate biomechanical differences between adults and adolescents highlight the need to assess spatiotemporal (cadence, step length, step width, contact time), kinetic (peak vertical ground reaction forces), and kinematic measures (foot landing and rotation at initial contact) among younger runners with musculoskeletal injury. 28 Given the prevalence of ankle sprains among young athletes, specifically runners, [30][31][32] examining spatiotemporal, kinetic, and kinematic biomechanical profiles among those who have sustained LAS could lead to intervention efforts designed to mitigate long-term impairments following LAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[26][27][28] Previous studies have identified distinct gait patterns among adolescent runners compared to previous findings among adult runners, particularly with higher peak vertical ground reaction forces, 29 varying foot strike types, longer stride lengths, and decreased step lengths. 28,29 These innate biomechanical differences between adults and adolescents highlight the need to assess spatiotemporal (cadence, step length, step width, contact time), kinetic (peak vertical ground reaction forces), and kinematic measures (foot landing and rotation at initial contact) among younger runners with musculoskeletal injury. 28 Given the prevalence of ankle sprains among young athletes, specifically runners, [30][31][32] examining spatiotemporal, kinetic, and kinematic biomechanical profiles among those who have sustained LAS could lead to intervention efforts designed to mitigate long-term impairments following LAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, it remains uncertain if these same adaptations would be apparent in an adolescent population due to key differences in motor control and development 26–28 . Previous studies have identified distinct gait patterns among adolescent runners compared to previous findings among adult runners, particularly with higher peak vertical ground reaction forces, 29 varying foot strike types, longer stride lengths, and decreased step lengths 28,29 . These innate biomechanical differences between adults and adolescents highlight the need to assess spatiotemporal (cadence, step length, step width, contact time), kinetic (peak vertical ground reaction forces), and kinematic measures (foot landing and rotation at initial contact) among younger runners with musculoskeletal injury 28 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As one of the biomechanical factors that are intuitive and easy to measure, the GRF is believed to be associated with overuse injuries in the lower limbs [22]. Another study explored the association between vGRF and running-related injuries and found that vGRF may be a risk factor for injuries in young runners [23]. It can be seen that biomechanical parameters play an irreplaceable role in predicting the risk of sports injuries and have been proven effective in many fields of injury risk prediction and assessment but have not yet been applied to the safety monitoring of firefighter training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Musculoskeletal injuries are common occurrences during physical exercise, especially among people with a low level of training [1][2][3][4]. Furthermore, different sports have a specific movement pattern that can estimate the risk of injury for athletes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%