2019
DOI: 10.3791/60280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Testing of Murine Tendons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After microCT scanning, the supraspinatus muscle was carefully removed from the tendon and the humerus was placed into custom 3-dimensional (3-D) printed fixtures 27 and tested in a saline bath at 37°C (Electroforce 3230; TA Instruments). For repair samples, the suture was cut before testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After microCT scanning, the supraspinatus muscle was carefully removed from the tendon and the humerus was placed into custom 3-dimensional (3-D) printed fixtures 27 and tested in a saline bath at 37°C (Electroforce 3230; TA Instruments). For repair samples, the suture was cut before testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For biomechanical testing, Achilles tendons were dissected at D56, wrapped in PBS-soaked gauze and frozen at −20C until time of testing. Tensile testing was performed in PBS at room temperature using custom 3D printed grips to secure the calcaneus bone and Achilles tendon (27, 28). Tendons were preloaded to 0.05N for ~1 min followed by ramp to failure at 1%/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro limitations include considerable issues associated with the gripping of the two tendon ends, which precludes the testing of the tendon-to-bone attachment. Testing the strength of the tendon-to-bone attachment is of considerable clinical value as rotator cuff re-tears usually develop at the junction between the tendon and the bone [131,132]. Although there are limitations with the biomechanical models used, the data reviewed is useful and all included studies faced the same limitations, making results comparable, with a trend towards improved maximum force, elastic modulus, and strength in EV treated groups.…”
Section: In Vivo Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations for future work would be the ex vivo testing of biomechanics using novel 3D-printed fixtures that exactly match the anatomies of the humerus and calcaneus to mechanically test supraspinatus tendon and Achilles tendon, respectively. Kurtaliaj et al's new approach eliminated artifactual gripping failures (e.g., growth plate failure rather than in the tendon), decreased overall testing time, and increased reproducibility [132]. Furthermore, it is challenging to generate models which mimic the cumulative damage seen in age or overuse related tendinopathy.…”
Section: In Vivo Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%