2003
DOI: 10.1114/1.1591190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Tissue Characterization of the Superior Joint Space of the Porcine Temporomandibular Joint

Abstract: The objective of this study was to characterize the biomechanical properties of articular cartilage in the superior joint space of the porcine temporomadibular joint (TMJ). These properties and thickness of the disk and fossa cartilage were obtained from eight joints using creep indentation. Five sites per surface were tested to obtain the aggregate modulus, Poisson's ratio, permeability, creep, recovery percentage, and cartilage thickness. Histology was also performed to characterize the orientation of the co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
84
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, flushing the joints with PBS was performed to ensure a consistent testing environment, although this condition differs from that in vivo. Second, the mixed background of the tested animals likely increased variability and discouraged detection of regional differences previously reported in the literature (Kim et al 2003;Lu et al 2009). Nevertheless, greater variability improves generalization of results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, flushing the joints with PBS was performed to ensure a consistent testing environment, although this condition differs from that in vivo. Second, the mixed background of the tested animals likely increased variability and discouraged detection of regional differences previously reported in the literature (Kim et al 2003;Lu et al 2009). Nevertheless, greater variability improves generalization of results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensile strength and stiffness correlate with local collagen orientation, with greater values present in the central region when tested in the anteroposterior direction relative to the mediolateral direction (Shengyi and Xu, 1991;Beatty et al, 2001;Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003b). Compressive properties vary topographically; the relaxation modulus of the medial region is highest, while the posterior and anterior bands appear to support the highest instantaneous loads (del Pozo et al, 2002;Kim et al, 2003;Athanasiou, 2005, 2006a). Overall, the disc is 10 to 1000 times softer under compression than it is under tension (Tanaka and van Eijden, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 Vertical deformation (DL) required to produce this strain was calculated using the strain equation, e ¼ DL=L 0 with the measured height (L 0 ) known from earlier measurement. The resulting compressive stress on each sample is defined by r ¼ F Z =A, where F Z is the compressive force and A is the cross-sectional area of the sample.…”
Section: Biomechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%