2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2005.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics and Biology of Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their early popularity is largely owed to the fact that they were found to provide better fixation in fractures with comminution of the soft metaphyseal bone, diffusely compromised bone quality, or periarticular fractures where unicortical screws are more appropriate to avoid violating the joint space. 22,[37][38][39][40][41] However, the early enthusiasm from favorable outcomes in distal radius fractures has rapidly led to the extension of the use of locking plates and screws in other fractures of the upper extremity, often without clear evidence-based guidelines supporting their use. 37 Locking plates and screws are also relatively more expensive than their non-locking counterparts, and one must therefore be careful when allocating resources to their use without clear evidence of improved outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their early popularity is largely owed to the fact that they were found to provide better fixation in fractures with comminution of the soft metaphyseal bone, diffusely compromised bone quality, or periarticular fractures where unicortical screws are more appropriate to avoid violating the joint space. 22,[37][38][39][40][41] However, the early enthusiasm from favorable outcomes in distal radius fractures has rapidly led to the extension of the use of locking plates and screws in other fractures of the upper extremity, often without clear evidence-based guidelines supporting their use. 37 Locking plates and screws are also relatively more expensive than their non-locking counterparts, and one must therefore be careful when allocating resources to their use without clear evidence of improved outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical and occupational therapy as a key element in rehabilitation starts after the removal of the fixation device. However, during the period of fixation, patients often keep their injured hand in rigid postures, in which the volar plates and adjacent ligaments of the digital joints are shortened[6]. Different methods of treatment, but especially the long immobilization periods lead to overall complication rates ranging from 6 to 80% and have been associated with poor functional outcomes[7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,4,5 Operative fixation is the treatment of choice for unstable distal radius fractures. 6,7 The ideal fixation method is one which can maintain a satisfactory reduction and allow early motion to avoid joint stiffness and disuse atrophy. 2,4 Open reduction and internal fixation with a plate placed dorsally provides the greatest degree of biomechanical stability for fractures with dorsal comminution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%