Biomechanics of implant-tooth supported prostheses: effects of mesiodistal implant angulation and mode of prosthesis connection

Bavbek, Andaç Barkın; Doğan, Arife; Çehreli, Murat Cavit

doi:10.5301/jabb.2011.8565

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More failures of this treatment modality were associated with maxillary bone, short implants, tilted implants, poor bone quality, and using endodontically treated teeth as abutments [14, 20, 28, 50, 51, 81, 82]. Block et al [51] reported the removal of 5 abutment teeth that were endodontically treated and connected to implants after being fractured at the interface of the post within the tooth.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, a long term follow-up clinical study of implant and tooth supported prostheses reported more biological complications and failures when abutment teeth were endodontically treated or had reduced bone attachment levels (i.e., affected by periodontal disease) [15]. Also, tilting the implants has biomechanical effects including increased peri-implant strains within implant-tooth supported prostheses during torque-tightening and under load [81]. …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Combined Implant and Tooth Support: An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Overview

AL‐Omiri

Almasri

Alhijawi

et al. 2017

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. This article presents a review on the concerned topics and some considerations related to the concept of splinting teeth and implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism. Study Selection. An electronic PubMed/MEDLINE and manual search of identified articles and reviews as well as clinical, laboratory, and finite element studies was performed in this project. Due to the shortage in within-subject, long term, randomized, controlled clinical trials regarding the subject a meta-analysis was not possible. Results. Although surrounded with some controversy, joining teeth and implants during the rehabilitation of partial edentulism provides the clinicians with more treatment options where proprioception and bone volume are maintained and distal cantilevers and free end saddles are eliminated. It makes the treatment less complex, of less cost, and more acceptable for the patient. Conclusions. Whenever suitable and justified, combining implant and tooth support might be recommended as an alternative during rehabilitation of partial edentulism. Based on the literature, clinical tips and suggestions were recommended to increase the success of this treatment.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined Implant and Tooth Support: An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Overview

AL‐Omiri

Almasri

Alhijawi

et al. 2017

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Implant therapy is a common treatment to replace missing teeth. When implants were first introduced, machined implants were the standard [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Since then, various types of implants with different surface properties have been developed with the objective of earlier attainment of osseointegration.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast, Bavbek et al . [ 5 ] reported that peri-implant stress increased with the use of a mesiodistal implant/tooth-supported connected prosthesis. Moreover, Zarone et al .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone

Koretake

Oue

Okada

et al. 2015

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to investigate how the connection of superstructures to implants with different surface properties affects the surrounding bone. The right and left mandibular premolars and molars of 5 dogs were extracted. After 12 weeks, a machined implant was placed mesially and an anodized implant was placed distally on one side of the edentulous jaw, with the positions reversed on the opposite side. Twelve weeks after implantation, splinted superstructures were set to the implants. At 24 weeks after implantation, the implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured, radiographs were obtained. Removal torque values were measured and histologic observation was performed. The ISQ values at 24 weeks after implantation were not significantly different between the groups. The removal torque values were significantly different between the distal anodized and distal machined implants (p < 0.05). From 12 to 24 weeks, marginal bone losses were not significantly different between the groups. Fluorescent observation of tissue samples revealed bone-remodeling activity around all of the implants. The results of this study suggest that when implants with different surface properties are connected, machined implants at the most distal sites might be a potential risk factor for implant-bone binding.

show abstract

“…eoretical problems are thought under the light of the clinical cases and help avoiding the complications related to the mobility of teeth-implant [20]. For this purpose, it will be better to consider the most common complication which is bone loss around the implant/teeth and intrusion of natural teeth.…”

Section: Advantages and Potential Problems In Connection Of Natural Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tooth-Implant Connection: A Review

Ramoğlu¹,

Taşar²,

Gunsoy³

et al. 2013

ISRN Biomaterials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Connecting teeth to osseointegrated implants presents a biomechanical challenge. is is due to the implant being rigidly �xed to the bone and the tooth being attached to the bone with a periodontal ligament. In order to overcome this problem, various connection types such as rigid and nonrigid have been proposed. However, the mechanism of attachment and the perceived problem of the differential support provided by the implant and the tooth have been discussed by many authors, and the ideal connection type is still controversial. e aim of this study was to carry out a review of all available literature addressing the tooth-implant connection and evidence-based understanding of the management of tooth-implant-retained restorations.

show abstract

Biomechanics of implant-tooth supported prostheses: effects of mesiodistal implant angulation and mode of prosthesis connection

Abstract: This investigation suggests that mesiodistal tilting of implants may have a biomechanical effect in tooth-implant supported prostheses.

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Combined Implant and Tooth Support: An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Overview

Combined Implant and Tooth Support: An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Overview

The Effect of Superstructures Connected to Implants with Different Surface Properties on the Surrounding Bone

Tooth-Implant Connection: A Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About