2008
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.f.00880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Abstract: In the presence of a massive rotator cuff tear, stable glenohumeral abduction without excessive superior humeral head translation requires significantly higher forces in the remaining intact portion of the rotator cuff. These force increases are within the physiologic range of rotator cuff muscles for 6-cm tears and most 7-cm tears. Increases in deltoid force requirements occur in early abduction; however, greater relative increases are required of the rotator cuff, especially in the presence of larger rotator… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
89
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
89
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, cuff repair should be performed before AHI narrowing. The results of our study are consistent with the concepts of massive cuff tear pathomechanics previously proposed by Burkhart [1], Hansen et al [15], and von Eisenhart-Rothe et al [24]. Nevertheless, isolated glenohumeral arthritis as described by Walch et al [25] (Grade 4A) may be related to increased glenohumeral reaction forces without a total loss of ''stable fulcrum kinematics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, cuff repair should be performed before AHI narrowing. The results of our study are consistent with the concepts of massive cuff tear pathomechanics previously proposed by Burkhart [1], Hansen et al [15], and von Eisenhart-Rothe et al [24]. Nevertheless, isolated glenohumeral arthritis as described by Walch et al [25] (Grade 4A) may be related to increased glenohumeral reaction forces without a total loss of ''stable fulcrum kinematics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results suggest that such ruptures may be the result of grade progression rather than a specific cause. The active flexion angles did not decrease even after grade progression in our study (Table 4), which could be the result of compensation, including a stable glenohumeral fulcrum [1] and increased reaction force at the glenohumeral joint in abduction [15]. As risk factors for the progression of the modified Hamada classification grade after biceps tenotomy of massive rotator cuff tears, Walch et al [25] reported teres minor atrophy in patients with severe fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle and fatty infiltration of the subscapularis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Inman 28) reported that the elevating force generated by the deltoid reaches a peak at 90° abduction; similarly, the humeral head restraining force generated by the rotator cuff reaches a peak at 60° abduction. Moreover, a biomechanical analysis of cadaver shoulders by Hansen et al 29) indicated that, for large rotator cuff tears (> 6 cm), up to 45% more deltoid force was required to elevate the arm to 90°. Stabilizing the humeral head within the glenoid cavity is most important at low-to mid-range elevations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hansen et al, utilising a cadaveric shoulder model, concluded that for 6-8cm rotator cuff tears a 22-45% increase in deltoid force was necessary to elevate the arm [Hansen et al, 2008]. McCully et al…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite this anatomical deficit, some patients with a MRCT are able to maintain function. This has led to the hypothesis that alternative muscle activation strategies can compensate for the deficient rotator cuff to establish a stable glenohumeral fulcrum for arm movement [Hansen et al, 2008;Steenbrink et al, 2006;Steenbrink et al, 2009]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%