2002
DOI: 10.1080/09638280110115393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury

Abstract: Purpose-Outline the biomechanics of reaching both in healthy individuals and in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI), and to discuss the clinical implications for using valid biomechanical models to assess reaching.Methods-A review of current literature, including a MEDLINE search using keywords of reaching, acquired brain injury, stroke, biomechanics and motor control.Results-Current assessments of the upper extremity in acquired brain injury (ABI) are focused on single joint characteristics of range … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FM Motor Performance Assessment has been used as a clinical and research tool for evaluating changes in motor impairment following stroke [31]. It has also been used to measure motor capabilities of persons recovering from other neurologic disorders, including TBI [37][38][39]. We used the UL portion of the FM Motor Performance Assessment (total UL score ranged from 0 to 66, based on a score of 0, 1, or 2 for each of the 33 test items).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FM Motor Performance Assessment has been used as a clinical and research tool for evaluating changes in motor impairment following stroke [31]. It has also been used to measure motor capabilities of persons recovering from other neurologic disorders, including TBI [37][38][39]. We used the UL portion of the FM Motor Performance Assessment (total UL score ranged from 0 to 66, based on a score of 0, 1, or 2 for each of the 33 test items).…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers [9,21,23,30] have studied upper extremity movements, but they have evaluated the movements on a ''coarse-grained'' basis. To understand how aging affects movements, it is necessary to perform ''fine-grained'' analysis and study specific and minor changes in motoric expressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, clinical tests are highly dependent on the examiner criteria. Further development of reliable and valid multi-joint biomechanical evaluations is required, particularly for goal oriented reaching movements (McCrea, Eng, & Hodgson, 2002). The lack of standardized protocols due to the large variety of movements, complexity of the upper extremity and lack of international consensus to validate the protocols hampered the advance on this area (van Andel, Wolterbeek, Doorenbosch, Veeger, & Harlaar, 2008).…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%