The principal aim of this study was to examine aspects of the reliability and validity of the Torque Angle Curve (TAC) technique as a measure of joint stiffness. Specifically, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were examined as well as the percent agreement of therapist evaluation of joint 'end feel' (i.e. springy or non-springy). Convergent validity of the TAC technique was studied by assessing the extent of agreement between TAC scores and therapist ratings of end feel. Thirty-eight joints were assessed in 24 subjects. Inter-rater reliability ICC (2,2) of the TAC technique was .80 and intra-rater reliability ICC (3,1) was .76 for rater A and ICC (3,1) .64 for rater B. Percent agreement for the end-feel technique was 68.4% with Kappa = .42. A significant difference was found between TAC scores for springy joints (mean [SD] 12.0˚ [3.7]) and TAC scores for non-springy joints (mean [SD] 7.2˚ [2.8]), when raters agreed on end feel (p = .000). When raters did not agree on end feel, the mean TAC score was 9.6˚ [2.2]. Results from this preliminary investigation suggest that the TAC technique provides a more reliable estimate of joint stiffness than the use of end feel. Further research with a larger sample size is required to replicate findings.