2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomedical engineering approaches to enhance therapeutic delivery for malignant glioma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanomedicine and therapeutics must be able to penetrate within the brain microenvironment to reach infiltrative cells that cause tumor recurrence and to provide more uniform drug distribution within tumors [10,11]. Therefore, in the last several years, many works have focused their attention on exploring new polymeric nanomedicines (using polymer nanoparticles, hydrogels, fibers, sprays) that could bypass Gliadel's drawbacks and allow therapeutics' diffusion in the GBM by active and passive targeting, achieving high local doses and improving survival [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanomedicine and therapeutics must be able to penetrate within the brain microenvironment to reach infiltrative cells that cause tumor recurrence and to provide more uniform drug distribution within tumors [10,11]. Therefore, in the last several years, many works have focused their attention on exploring new polymeric nanomedicines (using polymer nanoparticles, hydrogels, fibers, sprays) that could bypass Gliadel's drawbacks and allow therapeutics' diffusion in the GBM by active and passive targeting, achieving high local doses and improving survival [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attraction of nanotechnology for intra-arterial drug delivery is multifold. Various authors noted these small particles could not only be loaded with different therapies, including small-molecule inhibitors, gene therapies or siRNAs, but could also be modified to cross the BBB through a variety of transport mechanisms and remain at the target site for longer periods of time to allow for a gradual release of loaded therapeutics [23,[105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the aforementioned needed improvement in preclinical models that better reflect postsurgical residual disease, an important factor alongside the development of such multimodal strategies will be further improvements in the efficient delivery of therapeutically active doses of drugs beyond the BBB, which remains a significant challenge in glioblastoma therapy [ 3 ]. Potential innovations on the horizon include the use of MRI‐directed magnetic nanoparticles [ 217 , 218 ], surgical delivery of in situ gelling agents [ 219 , 220 ] and enhanced intrathecal/cerebrospinal fluid delivery using novel viral vectors, antibody ligands or exosomes [ 221 , 222 , 223 ]. Such approaches, in addition to traditional oral or intravenous delivery approaches, coupled with novel ways to disrupt the BBB, such as ultrasound [ 224 , 225 ] or TTFields [ 226 ]‐based approaches, will hopefully provide the best chance for DDR‐targeting approaches to provide much‐needed clinical benefit to patients and families faced with the devastating diagnosis of a high‐grade glioma.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%