2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomimetic electrochemical sensor for the highly selective detection of azithromycin in biological samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2020) recently explored MIP for detecting Aazithromycin (AZI), where they demonstrated a simple approach to for synthesising MIPs. [67]. Following mechanical polishing of the glassy carbon electrode, the electrodes were placed in a container with the reagents needed for synthesising the MIP.…”
Section: Molecular Imprinted Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2020) recently explored MIP for detecting Aazithromycin (AZI), where they demonstrated a simple approach to for synthesising MIPs. [67]. Following mechanical polishing of the glassy carbon electrode, the electrodes were placed in a container with the reagents needed for synthesising the MIP.…”
Section: Molecular Imprinted Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excess reagents were rinsed under acidic conditions, which to released AZI molecules, leaving behind an imprinted site for selective re-binding. This facile approach to producing a highly selective biorecognition layer will indeed expedite research [67]..…”
Section: Molecular Imprinted Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the most common redox probe in this area of research, as an indirect detection method, is potassium ferri/ferrocyanide (K 3 /K 4 [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3À/4À ). This can be done utilizing various electro(analytical) techniques such as cyclic voltammetry (CV), [152] electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), [153] and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). [154][155][156] CV typically will not reach the same levels of detection as other electroanalytical techniques; however, the analytical response can be amplified by adding extra components to the system.…”
Section: Using Redox Probes To Monitor Mip/target Binding Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many other groups were studied: macrolides – azithromycin in river and tap water, human serum, urine, plasma and tears, 67,69,93 erythromycin in water, urine and honey, milk and milk powder 42,123‐125 and tulathromycin in biological samples of pork (liver, flesh and serum) 96 ; aminoglycosides – kanamycin in samples of pig and chicken liver, 36 residual water 84 honey and milk 92,98 and streptomycin in samples of porcine kidney and honey, 105 milk and honey 130 ; quinolones – ciprofloxacin in milk and water (tap and mineral), 121 and biological samples (human urine and serum), 120 enrofloxacin in pharmaceuticals 60 levofloxacin in pharmaceuticals, water andacetonitrile, 99,100 moxifloxacin in urine and pharmaceuticals, 90,126 norfloxacin in residual water and human urine 11,137 and pazufloxacin in buffer 107 ; sulfonamides – sulfaguanidine in samples of honey, 68 sulfamethoxazole in samples of lake water 103 and milk, 73 sulfaquinoxaline in samples of milk, 88 sulfasalazine in human serum 131 and sulfadimethoxine in water 78,116 ; nitroimidazole – methimazole in human serum and drug tablets, 101 metronidazole in biological samples (human blood, plasma and serum, 37,41 mouse blood 86 and fish tissues 85 ), food samples (honey and milk) 40 and in pharmaceuticals (tablets and injections), 76 while methimazole MIPs were used to quantify samples of human serum and tablets 101 . Other compounds include nitrofurantoin in alimentation matrices, 59 and chloramphenicol in food samples (milk and honey), 35,38,81,117,119 in human urine 70 in aquarium waters for fish, 62 and mariculture water, 118 florfenicol in water 137 and thiamphenicol in feed matrices 89…”
Section: Analytes and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electroanalytical methods used for detection were mainly voltammetric – differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), 42,69,71,75 square‐wave voltammetry (SWV), 57,81,94,103 cyclic voltammetry(CV) 67,98,132,136 – and impedimetric, 74 some researchers apply both techniques for more robust results 44,62,68,86 . In general, DPV is more sensitive than CV (~ high nmol L −1 vs ~ μmol L −1 ), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is more sensitive than DPV (~ low nmol L −1 vs ~ high nmol L −1 ), 145 but it is less selective, 146 so the combination of those techniques is encouraged for more reliable results 86,90,92 .…”
Section: Instrumental Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%