2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-020-09947-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomolecular interactions of selected buffers with hemoglobin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies showed that increasing sodium phosphate buffer concentration (0.05 -1.0 M) increased lysozyme, stem bromelain protease and human serum albumin stability [15]. The thermal stability of lysozyme and hemoglobin decreased along the series TRIS (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane) > TES (N-[tris (hydroxymethyl) methyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid) ~ TAPS (N-[tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl] 3-aminopropanesulfonic acid) buffer [20]. The diffusion coefficient of monoclonal antibodies was buffer specific, decreasing in the order: citrate > succinate > phosphate > histidine ≈ acetate [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies showed that increasing sodium phosphate buffer concentration (0.05 -1.0 M) increased lysozyme, stem bromelain protease and human serum albumin stability [15]. The thermal stability of lysozyme and hemoglobin decreased along the series TRIS (tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane) > TES (N-[tris (hydroxymethyl) methyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid) ~ TAPS (N-[tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl] 3-aminopropanesulfonic acid) buffer [20]. The diffusion coefficient of monoclonal antibodies was buffer specific, decreasing in the order: citrate > succinate > phosphate > histidine ≈ acetate [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%