Proteomic Profiling and Analytical Chemistry 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-59378-8.00002-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomolecules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conformational changes to tertiary protein structure under conditions of high hydrostatic pressures allow for enhanced access to proteolytic cleavage sites, dramatically reducing incubation times (∼18 h to <1 h) without the need for prior chemical reduction of intramolecular disulfide bonds. 41,42 Moreover, streamlining the sample preparation protocol increases throughput for future deployment in molecular epidemiology studies and minimizes impacts of technical variance and artifacts introduced during sample handling. In successive experiments, we evaluated: methanol precipitation of albumin (vs no albumin isolation), enzyme (trypsin, LysC, or both), temperature (37 vs 55 °C), pressure (20 kpsi, 45 kpsi, or 20/45 kpsi sequentially), and time (30 vs 60 min) on assay performance.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conformational changes to tertiary protein structure under conditions of high hydrostatic pressures allow for enhanced access to proteolytic cleavage sites, dramatically reducing incubation times (∼18 h to <1 h) without the need for prior chemical reduction of intramolecular disulfide bonds. 41,42 Moreover, streamlining the sample preparation protocol increases throughput for future deployment in molecular epidemiology studies and minimizes impacts of technical variance and artifacts introduced during sample handling. In successive experiments, we evaluated: methanol precipitation of albumin (vs no albumin isolation), enzyme (trypsin, LysC, or both), temperature (37 vs 55 °C), pressure (20 kpsi, 45 kpsi, or 20/45 kpsi sequentially), and time (30 vs 60 min) on assay performance.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%