2023
DOI: 10.1039/d3em00235g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomonitoring, exposure routes and risk assessment of chlorinated paraffins in humans: a mini-review

Abstract: Chlorinated paraffins (CPs), which were conventionally classified into short- (SCCPs), medium- (MCCPs) and long- (LCCPs) chain CPs, have received growing attention due to their wide usage and extensively detection in...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 95 publications
(259 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given their potential for environmental persistence, bioaccumulation, , and long-range transport, , CPs have been detected ubiquitously in various environmental media, biota, and humans, often at concentrations surpassing those of well-investigated organic pollutants. , Considering the large historical production and use of CPs, , alongside their potential adverse effects on wildlife and humans, national agencies and global treaties are actively evaluating and regulating these substances. For instance, SCCPs have been listed and regulated as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) under the Stockholm Convention since 2017 . MCCPs are currently under evaluation and review by the Stockholm Convention POPs Review Committee, which has recently determined that their hazard properties meet all four criteria for regulation under the Stockholm Convention .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their potential for environmental persistence, bioaccumulation, , and long-range transport, , CPs have been detected ubiquitously in various environmental media, biota, and humans, often at concentrations surpassing those of well-investigated organic pollutants. , Considering the large historical production and use of CPs, , alongside their potential adverse effects on wildlife and humans, national agencies and global treaties are actively evaluating and regulating these substances. For instance, SCCPs have been listed and regulated as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) under the Stockholm Convention since 2017 . MCCPs are currently under evaluation and review by the Stockholm Convention POPs Review Committee, which has recently determined that their hazard properties meet all four criteria for regulation under the Stockholm Convention .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%