2020
DOI: 10.2478/acph-2020-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biopharmaceutical classification of desloratadine – not all drugs are classified the easy way

Abstract: AbstractThe biopharmaceutical classification of drugs was designed as a basis for bio-waivers – a mechanism with the double ethical benefit of delivering new drug formulations to the market with less human testing and lower cost. However, many drugs defy simple classification because in vitro permeability and stability assessment can be challenging as shown in this study for desloratadine. Literature shows that desloratadine is highly soluble, while d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(n=4) [18] . Although these findings indicate the low permeability compared to Metoprolol tartrate, which is used as a reference for permeability classification [19] , the effect of the formulation on the permeability of MLP should be assessed by comparing the permeability of MLP in solution and formulation with further evaluation [19] , [20] , [21] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(n=4) [18] . Although these findings indicate the low permeability compared to Metoprolol tartrate, which is used as a reference for permeability classification [19] , the effect of the formulation on the permeability of MLP should be assessed by comparing the permeability of MLP in solution and formulation with further evaluation [19] , [20] , [21] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…43,44 Pre-surgery simulations were performed using the default ACAT inputs, except for the percent fluid volumes in the small intestine (23%) and colon (0.5%), which were taken from the literature. 45 The additional ACAT model adjustments for postbariatric patients included stomach pH value (increased from optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile; in accordance with the literature data 64 55 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile, in accordance with the literature data 62 clearance, CL (L/h/kg) 6 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile, while keeping the optimized values within the range of the literature-reported data 65,66 0.8 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile while keeping the optimized values within the range of the literature-reported data 53,67 volume of distribution, V d (L/kg) 4 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile, while keeping the optimized values within the range of the literature-reported data 65,66 10 optimized to match the simulated human plasma concentration profile while keeping the optimized values within the range of the literature-reported data 53,67 distribution constant, k…”
Section: Ex Vivo Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Terminal elimination half-life (h) ~8.5 ( 21) 27 (22) Urinary excretion (% of radioactive dose) 41% (22,36) 30% (37) Urinary excretion (% of dose) <2% ( 38) <2% (37) Faecal excretion (% of radioactive dose) 47% (22,36) Faecal excretion (% of dose) <7% (38) Negligible (37) MW, molecular weight, in Dalton; pKa, acid-base dissociation constant; B/P, blood plasma distribution ratio; Fu,p, fraction of unbound in plasma; Vss, volume of distribution at steady state; CL/F, bioavailability-corrected clearance.…”
Section: Supplementarymentioning
confidence: 99%