2001
DOI: 10.1007/s007750100223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biophysical analysis of natural, double-helical DNA modified by anticancer heterocyclic complexes of ruthenium(III) in cell-free media

Abstract: Modifications of natural DNA by three anticancer heterocyclic ruthenium(III) compounds were studied by methods of molecular biophysics. These methods included DNA binding studies using atomic absorption spectrophotometry, inhibition of restriction endonucleases, mapping of DNA adducts by transcription assay, interstrand cross-linking employing gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions, DNA unwinding studied by gel electrophoresis, circular dichroism analysis of the B-->Z transition in DNA, and DNA meltin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, this study demonstrates that ruthenium(III) compounds inhibit NO-dependent angiogenesis, and highlights a rather innovative mechanism of action for heavy metal-based compounds, which are currently hypothesised to act via DNAbinding (Malina et al, 2001). The antimetastatic activity of these metallodrugs might be multiple, interfering with the endothelial cell functions during angiogenesis, angiogenic factor overexpression, the vasodilating state of tumours and probably tumour cell invasiveness, each event being demonstrated by different groups as NO-dependent (Fukumura et al, 1997;Gallo et al, 1998;Jadeski and Lala, 1999;Orucevic et al, 1999;Jadeski et al, 2000;Morbidelli et al, 2001;Feng et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In conclusion, this study demonstrates that ruthenium(III) compounds inhibit NO-dependent angiogenesis, and highlights a rather innovative mechanism of action for heavy metal-based compounds, which are currently hypothesised to act via DNAbinding (Malina et al, 2001). The antimetastatic activity of these metallodrugs might be multiple, interfering with the endothelial cell functions during angiogenesis, angiogenic factor overexpression, the vasodilating state of tumours and probably tumour cell invasiveness, each event being demonstrated by different groups as NO-dependent (Fukumura et al, 1997;Gallo et al, 1998;Jadeski and Lala, 1999;Orucevic et al, 1999;Jadeski et al, 2000;Morbidelli et al, 2001;Feng et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…1% of total DNA adducts, ca. six times less than cisplatin) was found in cell-free assays [84], and the unwinding of negatively supercoiled plasmid DNA was less pronounced (ca. 78 vs. 138 per adduct).…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…78 vs. 138 per adduct). The DNA adducts of KP1019 displayed only a low capacity of terminating transcription [84].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such activation can be used to increase the specificity towards tumours, because only the affected areas are irradiated selectively, thus decreasing the adverse side effects observed with thermally activated drugs, such as cisplatin [15][16][17][18][19]. It should be noted that related complexes have been shown to reach the cellular nucleus and, upon irradiation with visible light, to cross-link the nuclear proteins p53 and PCNA, as well as to form protein-DNA adducts, and to inhibit DNA replication [21]; moreover, other ruthenium complexes are undergoing clinical trials [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%