2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biophysical limits to responses of water flux to vapor pressure deficit in seven tree species with contrasting land use regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(78 reference statements)
3
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the increase in daily E t with increasing VPD suggests a weak stomatal control of transpiration and indicates possible anisohydric regulation and non‐conservative water use. This response is in agreement with the view point of Gao et al (), who described that this eucalypt hybrid has relatively low stomatal control of water use. Moreover, the precipitation showed a significantly uneven distribution, and the stand‐scale transpiration did not show a significant linear relationship with precipitation ( p > .05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our study, the increase in daily E t with increasing VPD suggests a weak stomatal control of transpiration and indicates possible anisohydric regulation and non‐conservative water use. This response is in agreement with the view point of Gao et al (), who described that this eucalypt hybrid has relatively low stomatal control of water use. Moreover, the precipitation showed a significantly uneven distribution, and the stand‐scale transpiration did not show a significant linear relationship with precipitation ( p > .05).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It is common for species within the same ecosystem to employ opposing hydraulic strategies (e.g., risk prone or risk adverse; McCulloh et al, ; Ford et al, ). Disparities in transpiration volume and timing, due to differences in whole‐plant hydraulic strategies employed within the same forest, have important implications for forest growth and response to drought and disturbance (Roman et al, ; McDowell et al, ; Matheny et al, ; Gao et al, ; Gu, Pallardy, Hosman, & Sun, ; Wullschleger, Meinzer, & Vertessy, ). Several water flux studies have shown that many species of ring‐porous, anisohydric oak continue to transpire after other species curtail their water use during mild to moderate drought (e.g., von Allmen, Sperry, & Bush, ; Baldocchi & Xu, ; Hernandez‐Santana, Martinez‐Fernandez, Moran, & Cano, ; Matheny et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which presumes that J s is equal to canopy transpiration, and J s is not influenced by hydraulic capacitance [30,31].…”
Section: Canopy Conductance Per Sapwood Areamentioning
confidence: 99%