1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7799(96)10067-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biophysical methods for the determination of antibody-antigen affinities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lateral diffusion/clustering) of ␣ V ␤ 3 . In contrast and as shown experimentally for PAC1 Fab and ␣ IIb ␤ 3 , a monovalent ligand is likely to be more sensitive to affinity than avidity modulation (23,30). We found that both penton base and WOW-1 Fab bound specifically and saturably to ␣ V ␤ 3 in an activation-dependent manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…lateral diffusion/clustering) of ␣ V ␤ 3 . In contrast and as shown experimentally for PAC1 Fab and ␣ IIb ␤ 3 , a monovalent ligand is likely to be more sensitive to affinity than avidity modulation (23,30). We found that both penton base and WOW-1 Fab bound specifically and saturably to ␣ V ␤ 3 in an activation-dependent manner.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…To accomplish this task, we characterized the binding of soluble monovalent and multivalent ligands to ␣ V ␤ 3 in several cell types, reasoning that a monovalent ligand would be sensitive to affinity modulation and a multivalent ligand would be sensitive to both affinity and avidity modulation (18,23,30). Penton base, a coat protein from adenovirus type 2, was selected as a multivalent ligand because each of its five subunits contains a 50-amino acid RGD tract that mediates virus internalization through ␣ V integrins (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for a more accurate comparison of the relative binding affinities of antibodies. Furthermore, this process is free of the mass transport limitations present in direct ELISAs (32,34). Taken together, both the direct and competitive ELISA results form supporting evi- dence that the 2F5 CDR H3 apex is important for mediating access to a possibly recessed epitope, although any underlying specificity of the 2F5 CDR H3 apex residues is not located within the 2F5 core epitope itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Indeed, 2F5 CDR H3 mutants were observed to bind differently to gp41 constructs in direct ELISAs, whereas they showed similar binding profiles in competitive ELISAs. Recognition of antibodies to the solid-phase adsorbed antigen may be limited by multiple factors, including the conformation of the antigens on the plate surface and steric repulsive and/or attractive interactions between the antibody molecules themselves (32,35,54). It is therefore not unlikely that removing a flexible hydrophobic moiety at the apex of the 2F5 antigen binding site would cause artifacts in apparent binding affinity for the gp41 epitope bound to the solid phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Half-lives of the GutR ⅐ DNA complexes were estimated based on the equation (t 1/2 ϭ 0.69/k d ) described by Neri et al (33). GutR is required to induce GutR to have a conformational change so that critical residues involved in ATP binding can be positioned in proper locations.…”
Section: Table I Kinetic Association and Dissociation Rate Constants mentioning
confidence: 99%