2007
DOI: 10.1177/0961463x07074099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biopolitics and Temporality in Arendt and Foucault

Abstract: The article demonstrates that Hannah Arendt's examination of modern temporality strongly intersects with Michel Foucault's diagnosis of modern biopolitics. Both observe three key features of biopolitical modernity: the political zoefication of life, a technocratic understanding of politics, and processual temporality which link the project of modernity to the project of 20th-century totalitarianism. Arendt, however, also offers an alternative, nonbiopolitical understanding of politics, life, and time captured … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Time is a disciplinary technology—one of control, management, and subjectification (Braun 2007:11; Thompson 1967). It is also a moralizing one.…”
Section: Positive Living and The Uses Of Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time is a disciplinary technology—one of control, management, and subjectification (Braun 2007:11; Thompson 1967). It is also a moralizing one.…”
Section: Positive Living and The Uses Of Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In discussions of power and the state, political theorists stress that time is an inherent aspect of a state's functioning. State power operates within temporal dimensions (Braun 2007;Casarino 2003;Gross 1985;Hutchings 2008) to perform a range of functions from producing knowledge on human life such as fertility, morbidity or mortality (Foucault 2003) to nation building based on shared temporality of the past or future (Anderson 1983;Massey 1995). Scholars adopting a life-course perspective have also highlighted that the state manages individual lives through institutionalizing time by determining qualifications for everything from marriage to driving, voting, working, or social services, to name just a few (Settersten and Mayer 1997).…”
Section: Structuring the 'Normal' Male Life Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allowed her to argue for the value of the ‘time interval between birth and death’ that could act as an existential frame with which to structure the span of a meaningful human life (Arendt : 97; cf. Braun : 19‐21). Ultimately, it enabled her to produce a philosophical outlook that displaced ‘process’ from its symbolic and conceptual throne and conjure a world in which alternative idioms and practices might crowd into view, and ‘time’ itself take a differential form.…”
Section: Towards An Immanent Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%