2009
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioprocesses for air pollution control

Abstract: Bioprocesses have been developed as relatively recent alternatives to conventional, non-biological technologies, for waste gas treatment and air pollution control in general. This paper reviews major biodegradation processes relevant in this field as well as both accepted and major innovative bioreactor configurations studied or used nowadays for the treatment of polluted air, i.e. biofilters, one-and two-liquid phase biotrickling filters, bioscrubbers, membrane bioreactors, rotating biodiscs and biodrums, one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
135
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
1
135
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Biotechnologies are cost-effective due to their low operational costs, low energy requirements and an absence of residual products requiring further treatment or disposal (Kennes et al 2009). Among the available biological gas treatments, biofilters (BFs) and biotrickling filters (BTFs) are of particular interest.…”
Section: Agency For Research On Cancer (Iarc 1987)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biotechnologies are cost-effective due to their low operational costs, low energy requirements and an absence of residual products requiring further treatment or disposal (Kennes et al 2009). Among the available biological gas treatments, biofilters (BFs) and biotrickling filters (BTFs) are of particular interest.…”
Section: Agency For Research On Cancer (Iarc 1987)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-Phase Partitioning Bioreactors (TPPBs) have been identified as one of the potential biotechnologies to treat hydrophobic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs; [1][2][3][4]). In such gasliquid-liquid processes, the mass transfer coefficient K L a is a key parameter in estimating reactor performance [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological methods are simple to operate and inexpensive [13]. Compared to the physicochemical treatments, biological methods are ecologically cleaner -the end products of biological treatment are carbon dioxide, water, sulfate and nitrate [17]. The basic pollutant removal mechanisms of all the reactors are similar, whereas the main differences come from the use of microorganisms (suspended in liquid or immobilized on biofilm), a type of packing medium, pollutant concentration etc.…”
Section: Methods For Odour Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%