BiOR2: when pest risk assessment meets computer-based multicriteria analysis for plant pest ranking and management

Tayeh, Christine; Guinehut, David; Van, Amandine Lê; Deguercy, Xavier; Tassus, Xavier; Gachet, Emmanuel; Manceau, Charles

doi:10.1007/s10530-020-02411-5

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This method was developed in 1986 by Brans et al and is cited in 1142 publications according to a request made in the Scopus database (October 2018), including 42 in agricultural and biological sciences and 185 in environmental sciences. The implementation of the PROMETHEE method in a system to rank pests threatening plants in a geographic area is the subject of a more recent publication (Tayeh et al, 2021).…”

Section: Ranking Methodology – Pilot Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this Appendix, each criterion is presented through several points: ‘Inclusion in other EU ranking systems’: This section is used to indicate whether other EU pest‐ranking systems use the criterion, even if it is not implemented following the same approach. The ranking systems considered are from: —Belgium: Belgian Harmonia+ and Pandora+ (D’hondt et al, 2015) referred to as H+/P+, —Finland: Finnish FinnPRIO (Heikkilä et al, 2016) referred to as FinnPRIO, —France: Moignot and Reynaud (2013) and Biological Organisms data Retrieval and Ranking system (Tayeh et al, 2021); these systems are referred to as M&R and BiOR² in the manuscript, —Norway: ERIN system (Wendell, 2016) referred to as ERIN, even though it is not an EU country, —The Netherlands: NVWA scheme (van der Gaag, 2017) referred to as NVWAs, —The United Kingdom: the UK Plant Health Risk Register (Baker et al, 2014) referred to as PHRR. ‘Description’: this section is used to describe the criterion, ‘Need for an automatic approach’: the possibility of an automated approach to be applied in the future is suggested: yes or no, ‘Scoring’: this section is used to present the scoring method and the scenario of how missing data are handled is indicated if relevant, ‘Data’: this section is used to indicate the data needed (specifying sources whenever possible), ‘Example’: various examples are given. Pests may be regulated or new emerging pests; in the case of regulated pests, they were chosen because they facilitate the illustration of the scoring system. …”

Section: Appendix a – The 16 Criteria Used To Score Pests In The Pilo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU

Tayeh¹,

Mannino²,

Mosbach‐Schulz³

et al. 2022

EFS2

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Following a request of the European Commission, EFSA and ANSES, beneficiary of the EFSA tasking grant on horizon scanning for plant pests (GP/EFSA/ALPHA/2017/02), developed a methodology to order by risk non-regulated pests recently identified through the monitoring of media and scientific literature. The ranking methodology proposed at the end of the pilot phase was based on the scoring of pests under evaluation following 16 criteria related to the steps of the pest risk assessment scheme. The multicriteria matrix of scores obtained was then submitted to the multicriteria analysis method PROMETHEE. The pilot methodology was tested on a limited number of pests (14 pests identified during the monitoring activity, and 4 'control' pests whose well-known risk should be reflected either in a positive or negative score), then applied on all non-regulated pests identified through the media and scientific literature monitoring in the first 2 years of the project. After having collected feedback from the targeted final users (EU risk managers), the methodology underwent a few refinements: (i) implementation of the methodology to a set of already assessed reference pests from EFSA opinions, (ii) exclusions of three criteria from the scoring phase, (iii) identification of pests proposed for further action ('positive' pests), using a threshold defined after scoring the reference pests.

show abstract

Section: Ranking Methodology – Pilot Phasementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Appendix a – The 16 Criteria Used To Score Pests In The Pilo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU

Tayeh¹,

Mannino²,

Mosbach‐Schulz³

et al. 2022

EFS2

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…-France: Moignot and Reynaud (2013) and the Biological Organisms Data Retrieval and Ranking System (Tayeh et al 2017); these systems are referred to as the M&R and BiOR² in this paper, -United Kingdom: the UK Plant Health Risk Register (Baker et al, 2014) referred to as the PHRR, -Belgium: Belgian Harmonia + and Pandora + (D'hondt et al, 2015) referred to as the H + /P + , -…”

Section: Models For Pest Ranking In the Eumentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of ranking systems for new plant threats in EU Member States and Third Countries: concepts and applications

Tayeh¹,

Mannino²

2021

EFS3

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A review of existing ranking systems for plant threats developed by EU Member States and Third Countries is presented in this report. The analysis of these ranking systems is done according to six main topics: 1) purpose of the ranking, 2) characteristics of pests, 3) patterns and features of the systems, 4) structure of the systems in terms of point scales and score aggregation, 5) treatment of missing data, expression of uncertainty and validation of the system via comparison with expert ranking or judgments, and 6) possibility of running several scenarios and application of different weightings. Common features between these systems as well as their main differences are highlighted. General recommendations are put forward, especially with a view to the development of a future ranking system for new non‐regulated pests.

show abstract

BiOR2: when pest risk assessment meets computer-based multicriteria analysis for plant pest ranking and management

Cited by 2 publications

References 24 publications

Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU

Proposal of a ranking methodology for plant threats in the EU

A review of ranking systems for new plant threats in EU Member States and Third Countries: concepts and applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About