2018
DOI: 10.31025/2611-4135/2018.13703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioreactor Landfills: Comparison and Kinetics of the Different Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(155 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, bioreactor landfills and their variations represent a sustainable alternative approach to conventional sanitary (dry tomb) landfills [52]. However, bioreactors can have drawbacks, e.g., odours and physical instability of the waste material due to increased moisture [53].…”
Section: Bioreactor Landfillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, bioreactor landfills and their variations represent a sustainable alternative approach to conventional sanitary (dry tomb) landfills [52]. However, bioreactors can have drawbacks, e.g., odours and physical instability of the waste material due to increased moisture [53].…”
Section: Bioreactor Landfillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, establishment of infrastructure for leachate recirculation and/or aeration may cause increased capital and operational costs [53]. Studies have suggested that the high upfront costs involved in operation and construction of bioreactor landfills can be balanced by future economic benefits, including an increase in the active life of the landfill (waste disposal period), more efficient use of airspace [54], lower minimum leachate treatment/disposal costs, delay in the need to construct a new cell and cap, savings in the post-closure care period thanks to less need for monitoring and lower financial guarantee obligations, and higher efficiency in landfill gas collection, resulting in larger revenues generated from production [55].…”
Section: Bioreactor Landfillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This quality is typically defined as final storage quali- Grossule et al, 2018;Grossule and Lavagnolo, 2019;Stegmann, 2003, 2007). the unrealistic opinion was held that 30 years after closure landfills no longer require special care and -if operated by the private sector -may be returned to the communities.…”
Section: Final Storage Quality and Closure Of The Aftercarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of a specific type depends on many factors (i.e., cost, regulations, climate, waste characteristics). Also, the goals of waste treatment (i.e., energy recovery, increasing the waste stabilization) play a role in landfill type selection (Grossule et al, 2018). One of the biggest challenges of landfilling technology is to maintain the performance of a landfill as its initial design purposes to minimize the risks to the surrounding environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%