2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00072-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioremediation of heavy metals in a synthetic wastewater using a rotating biological contactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The biofilter system was efficient and fulfilled a performance analogous to other described technologies for the bioremediation of heavy metals from water (Costley & Wallis, 2001;Leonhäuser et al, 2006;Malik, 2004). After one initial phase of unstable biofilter efficiency (first 10 day cycle of operation), possibly due to the adaptation of the microbiota to the new milieu, the submerged fixed biofilm succeeded in the removal of up to 90 % of Cu(II) when it was working in continuous mode for a period over 200 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The biofilter system was efficient and fulfilled a performance analogous to other described technologies for the bioremediation of heavy metals from water (Costley & Wallis, 2001;Leonhäuser et al, 2006;Malik, 2004). After one initial phase of unstable biofilter efficiency (first 10 day cycle of operation), possibly due to the adaptation of the microbiota to the new milieu, the submerged fixed biofilm succeeded in the removal of up to 90 % of Cu(II) when it was working in continuous mode for a period over 200 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…3), verifying that Cu(II) removal from water takes place through interaction with the bacterial exopolymers. Bacterial extracellular polymers were also found responsible for the metal-binding ability of biofilms grown in a rotating biological contactor in the presence of copper and other heavy metals (Costley & Wallis, 2001). Although the present study did not demonstrate the involvement of the bacterial cell surfaces in metal removal, metals ions can also bind to electronegative sites of the lipopolysaccharide, phospholipids and other molecules (Bruins et al, 2000;Ferris, 1989); hence it is possible that part of the Cu(II) from the water could also have become bound to the cell walls of some or all of the organisms in the biofilm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Common treatment technologies for lead removal include chemical precipitation and adsorption. However, precipitation becomes less effective and more expensive at high metal concentrations [12] and successful adsorption depends on finding low-cost, high-capacity sorbents [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] or microorganisms that accumulate toxic metals [24][25][26] . Innovative nanospheres have shown promise for lead complexation.…”
Section: Introducing Nanotechnology Into Environmental Engineering Cumentioning
confidence: 99%