Bioresorbable vascular scaffold strut disruption after crossing with an optical coherence tomography imaging catheter

Sato, Kastsumasa; Panoulas, Vasileios F.; Naganuma, Toru; Miyazaki, Tadashi; Latib, Azeem; Colombo, Antonio

doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.186

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both modalities are feasible with the provisos that present IVUS catheters have a higher crossing profile and provide lower resolution compared to OCT, and that OCT may increase use of contrast and does not allow for aorto-ostial assessments 68 . At present, crossing into a jailed SB using IVUS or OCT wires is not advised, as they might distort or fracture 69 the stent. Both modalities may be used for assessment of lesion composition and distribution, results of predilatation, reference sizing and evaluation of adequate vessel expansion after stenting [70][71][72] .…”

Section: Adjunctive Intracoronary Imaging In Bifurcation Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings

Lassen¹,

Holm²,

Stanković³

et al. 2014

EuroIntervention

235

199

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Bifurcation Club (EBC) is an independent, non-political and informal "think tank" of scientists with a particular interest in clinical, technical and fundamental aspects of the management of coronary artery bifurcation disease. Bifurcations account for 15-20% of all percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and remain one of the most challenging lesions in interventional cardiology in terms of procedural success rate as well as long-term cardiac events. The optimal management is, despite a fast growing scientific literature, still the subject of considerable debate, one of the main concerns being the potential increased risk of late stent thrombosis associated with treatment complexity. The EBC was initiated in 2004 and aims to facilitate an exchange of ideas on management of bifurcation disease. The EBC hosts an annual, compact meeting dedicated to bifurcations which brings together physicians, engineers, biologists, physicists, epidemiologists and statisticians for detailed discussions. Every meeting is finalised with a consensus statement which reflects the unique opportunity of combining the opinion of interventional cardiologists with the opinion of a large variety of other scientists on bifurcation management. This year the EBC celebrates its 10-year anniversary. This consensus document represents the summary of the consensus from the last ten years of the annual EBC meetings.

show abstract

Section: Adjunctive Intracoronary Imaging In Bifurcation Treatmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings

Lassen¹,

Holm²,

Stanković³

et al. 2014

EuroIntervention

235

199

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The present IVUS catheters have a higher crossing profile and provide lower resolution compared to OCT (optical coherence tomography), and that OCT may increase use of contrast and does not allow for aorto-ostial assessments [62]. As of today, crossing into a jailed SB using IVUS or OCT wire is not recommended, as they might distort or fracture [63]. Like IVUS, OCT may be used for assessing lesion composition and distribution, results of predilatation, reference sizing and evaluation of adequate vessel expansion after stenting [64,65].…”

Section: Application Of Intracoronary Imagingmentioning

confidence: 98%

Stenting of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Data to Clinical Practice

Chen¹

2015

J Cardiovasc Dis Diagn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Should single-stent or double-stent strategies be used routinely for bifurcations?3) Which technique should be preferred amongst double-stent strategies?4) Whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is to be routinely used for the procedure?5) What would be the optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy for patients getting distal LMCA stenting?With the above in mind, the author reviews the evidence supporting PCI for LMCA stenosis, as compared with CABG. And discuss various interventional techniques, as well as adjunctive devices and pharmacotherapy [7]. Evidence of PCI with Drug-Eluting Stent in LMCA StenosisThe evolution of DES has been a major breakthrough in PCI of LMCA leading to significant reduction in restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) when compared with initial experiences with bare-metal stents (BMS) [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Three single-centre studies showed high procedural success rates, low procedural complication rates, and encouraging long-term outcome [12][13][14]. The results were confirmed by the FRIEND (French multicentre RegIstry for stenting of uNprotecteD LMCA stenosis) registry that showed excellent results when stenting LMCA despite having 66% of patients with bifurcation [15]. DES in LMCA PCI has been evaluated in several single-and

show abstract

“…IVUS allows better characterisation of plaque burden and does not require vessel flushing during acquisition. Advancing an imaging catheter into a jailed SB is not recommended, as distortion or fracture of the stent can occur or the wire could be trapped 61 . The main focus points for guiding bifurcation stenting using intravascular imaging are the following.…”

Section: Intracoronary Imagingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club

Burzotta²,

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Bifurcation Club (EBC) was initiated in 2004 to support a continuous overview of the field of coronary artery bifurcation interventions and aims to facilitate a scientific discussion and an exchange of ideas on the management of bifurcation disease. The EBC hosts an annual, two-day compact meeting, dedicated to bifurcations, which brings together physicians, pathologists, engineers, biologists, physicists, mathematicians, epidemiologists and statisticians for detailed discussions. Every meeting is finalised with a consensus statement that reflects the unique opportunity of combining the opinion of interventional cardiologists with the opinion of a large variety of other scientists on bifurcation management. A series of consensus sessions dedicated to specific topics, to strengthen the consensus debates and focus the discussions, was introduced at this year's meeting. The sessions comprise an intensive overview of the present literature, a pro and con debate and a voting system, to guide the consensus-building process. The present document represents the summary of the up-to-date EBC consensus and recommendations from the 12th annual EBC meeting in 2016 in Rotterdam.

show abstract

Bioresorbable vascular scaffold strut disruption after crossing with an optical coherence tomography imaging catheter

Cited by 7 publications

References 4 publications

Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings

Percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation disease: consensus from the first 10 years of the European Bifurcation Club meetings

Stenting of Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Data to Clinical Practice

Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About