Guide to Biometric Reference Systems and Performance Evaluation 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-292-0_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BioSecure Multimodal Evaluation Campaign 2007 (BMEC’2007)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, despite the initial acceptance in the literature, the usage of synthetically generated users, also known as "chimeric users", was discussed and compared with the use of emerging multimodal biometric databases [3][4][5], concluding that independence assumption does not guarantee the same performance when using "chimeric" than true multimodal users and that the results strongly depend on which traits are selected. According to these studies, a relatively significant number of multimodal biometric databases have appeared in a recent past aimed to provide reliable testing frameworks [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, despite the initial acceptance in the literature, the usage of synthetically generated users, also known as "chimeric users", was discussed and compared with the use of emerging multimodal biometric databases [3][4][5], concluding that independence assumption does not guarantee the same performance when using "chimeric" than true multimodal users and that the results strongly depend on which traits are selected. According to these studies, a relatively significant number of multimodal biometric databases have appeared in a recent past aimed to provide reliable testing frameworks [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%