2013
DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.106569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosimilars: Current regulatory perspective and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire comprised 46 questions classified into 5 sections (Table 1): the first section recorded participant demographics, specialty, and level of experience (6 questions); the second section focused on practices and attitudes toward biosimilar use in clinical practice (22 questions); the third section dealt with interchangeability, including reverse and multiple switches (9 questions); the fourth section addressed the nocebo effect and nonmedical switch (5); and the last section covered current and future perspectives (4 questions). Only the demographic questions were mandatory, and the number of respondents was reported for each question to account for missing data.…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The questionnaire comprised 46 questions classified into 5 sections (Table 1): the first section recorded participant demographics, specialty, and level of experience (6 questions); the second section focused on practices and attitudes toward biosimilar use in clinical practice (22 questions); the third section dealt with interchangeability, including reverse and multiple switches (9 questions); the fourth section addressed the nocebo effect and nonmedical switch (5); and the last section covered current and future perspectives (4 questions). Only the demographic questions were mandatory, and the number of respondents was reported for each question to account for missing data.…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a regulatory standpoint, a robust legal framework has been put in place, and ever since the first biosimilar received approval, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has implemented a specific pathway for biosimilar approval. This pathway relies on a thorough comparability exercise to ascertain biosimilarity [5,6]. Biosimilars undergo testing for at least one indication of the originator in phase I and III clinical trials, and the results may be extrapolated to other indications [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%