2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0011-9164(04)00172-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosorption of copper (II) from aqueous solutions by wheat shell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
60
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
6
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimum pH for further adsorption experiments was selected as 6.0. Similar results have been reported by a number of earlier researchers studying Cu metal biosorption on different biomasses [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optimum pH for further adsorption experiments was selected as 6.0. Similar results have been reported by a number of earlier researchers studying Cu metal biosorption on different biomasses [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…After this, due to slower diffusion of adsorbate, the rate of adsorption become slow [6]. Similar results have been reported by a number of earlier researchers studying Cu metal biosorption on different adsorbents [29][30][31][35][36] The efficiency of the biosorption process was determined by applying the pseudo-first-order (PFO), pseudo-second- Turk On the other hand, further increase in adsorbent amount from 1.1-2.0 g/ 50 mL, the amount of adsorbed Cu (II) ions decreases from 85% to 72%. This decrease may be due to the overlapping or aggregation of adsorption sites also the time required to reach the equilibrium decreased at higher doses of SB [6].…”
Section: Effect Of Contact Time: Adsorption Kineticssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…At the optimal pH of 6.0, 74% and 62% of Fe +3 and Cu +2 ions were removed by peanut hulls,respectively Similarly, Basci et al, (2004) and Waseem et al, (2014) reported that pH has a significant role on heavy metal ions removal. …”
Section: +3mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The agricultural byproducts such as peat, wood, pine park, banana pith, rice bran, wheat bran, peanut shells, wool, rice milling byproducts (hulls and bran), sunflower and grape stalks wastes, sugar beet pulp, olive mill solid residue, sawdust and leaves have been demonstrated to remove heavy metal ions from wastewater. Many examples are available in the literature concerning the direct or activated use of these materials as adsorbents (Lee and Yang, 1997;Sun and Shi, 1998;Ajmal et al, 1998;Gupta and Ali, 2000;Wartelle and Marshall, 2000;Yu et al, 2000;Pagnanelli et al, 2002;Johnson et al, 2002;Ho, 2003;Basci et al, 2004;Villaescusa et al, 2004;Dronnet et al, 1997;Gerente et al, 2000;Reddad et al, 2002;Kartel et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%