Biosorptive capacity of Cd(II) and Cu(II) by lyophilized cells of Pseudomonas stutzeri

Hassan, Sedky H.A.; Kim, Su-Jung; Jung, A Young; Joo, Jin Ho; Oh, Sang‐Eun; Yang, Jae E.

doi:10.2323/jgam.55.27

Cited by 66 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Besides, the results showed that a 30 min sorption period was the best option to ensure the metal removal from solution and good recovery from biosorbent. Similar results were observed by Hassan et al (2009) who concluded that the optimum time for biosorption of Cu and Cd by P. stutzeri was 30 min. pH effect The pH seems to be the most important parameter in the biosorption process.…”

Section: Contact Time Effectsupporting

confidence: 88%

“…Metal biosorption by microorganisms is a complex process that depends on the chemistry of the metal ions, cell wall composition of microorganisms, cell physiology, and physicochemical factors such as pH, temperature, time, ionic strength and metal concentration (Hassan et al, 2009;Gabr et al, 2008;Tuzen et al, 2008;GodlewskaZylkiewicz, 2006;Mapoletoet al, 2005;Chaisuksant 2003;Goyalet al, 2003;Volesky 2003;Klimmeket al, 2001;Leung et al, 2001). Removal of toxic heavy metal ions from polluted waste waters by bacterial biomass has been studied extensively in the last few decades (Joo et al, 2010, Hassan et al, 2009Tuzen et al, 2008;Akhtar et al, 2007;Kadukova and Vircikova 2005;Chaisuksant, 2003;Leung et al, 2001;Veglio et al, 1997;Akthar and Mohan, 1995;Fourest et al, 1994;Volesky, 2003;1994;.…”

Section: Heavy Metals Removal By Microorganismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Removal of toxic heavy metal ions from polluted waste waters by bacterial biomass has been studied extensively in the last few decades (Joo et al, 2010, Hassan et al, 2009Tuzen et al, 2008;Akhtar et al, 2007;Kadukova and Vircikova 2005;Chaisuksant, 2003;Leung et al, 2001;Veglio et al, 1997;Akthar and Mohan, 1995;Fourest et al, 1994;Volesky, 2003;1994;. Microbial biomass have the ability to remove heavy metals from contaminated sites by two process; (1) biosorption ''an energy-independent binding of metals to cell wall'', and (2) bioaccumulation ''an energy-dependent process of metal uptake into the cells'' (Karna et al, 1999;Gadd, 1992).…”

Section: Heavy Metals Removal By Microorganismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The value of Langmuir constant b (L/mg), represents a ratio of adsorption rate constant to desorption rate constant, which also gives an indication of the affinity of the metal for binding sites on the biosorbent, q max and b can be determined from the linear form of Langmuir equation (2) by plotting C eq /q eq vs C eq (Hassan et al, 2009;Norton et al, 2004;Volesky, 2003;Aksu and Dönmez 2001;Puranik and Paknikar 1999;Veglio et al, 1997;Chong and Volesky, 1995;Volesky and Holan, 1995). Langmuir model was chosen to estimate the maximum adsorption capacity corresponding to complete monolayer coverage on the biomass surface.…”

Section: Langmuir Isothermmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast to Langmuir model, Freundlich equation measures the adsorption capacity K f , and the intensity of adsorption (n). (Hassan et al, 2009;Goyal et al, 2003;Volesky, 2003;Chong and Volesky, 1995;Mattuschka and Strauble, 1993;Aksu and Dönmez 2001;Puranik and Paknikar, 1999).…”

Section: Freundlich Adsorption Isothermmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Bacteria and Fungi as Alternatives for Remediation of Water Resources Polluting Heavy Metals

Joo

Hussein²,

Hassan³

2011

Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Classical methods which used for removal of heavy metals from contaminated water are adsorption, precipitation, coagulation, ion exchange resin, evaporation, and membrane processes. Microbial biosorption can be used for the removal of contaminated waters with pollutants such as heavy metals and dyes which are not easily biodegradable. Microbial biosorbents are inexpensive, eco friendly and more effective for the removal of toxic metals from aqueous solution. In this review, the bacterial and fungal abilities for heavy metals ions removal are emphasized. Environmental factors which affect biosorption process are also discussed. A detailed description for the most common isotherm and kinetic models are presented. This article reviews the achievements and the current status of bacterial and fungal biosorption technology for heavy metals removal and provides insights for further researches.

show abstract

Section: Contact Time Effectsupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Heavy Metals Removal By Microorganismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Heavy Metals Removal By Microorganismsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Langmuir Isothermmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Freundlich Adsorption Isothermmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Bacteria and Fungi as Alternatives for Remediation of Water Resources Polluting Heavy Metals

Joo

Hussein²,

Hassan³

2011

Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Composting and Bioremediation Potential of Thermophiles

Mir

Hamid

Rohela

et al. 2021

Soil Bioremediation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biosorption of Cd(II) and Zn(II) by Nostoc commune: Isotherm and Kinetics Studies

Morsy

Hassan

Koutb

2011

CLEAN Soil Air Water

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, Nostoc commune (cyanobacterium) was used as an inexpensive and efficient biosorbent for Cd(II) and Zn(II) removal from aqueous solutions. The effect of various physicochemical factors on Cd(II) and Zn(II) biosorption such as pH 2.0-7.0, initial metal concentration 0.0-300 mg/L and contact time 0-120 min were studied. Optimum pH for removal of Cd(II) and Zn(II) was 6.0, while the contact time was 30 min at room temperature. The nature of biosorbent and metal ion interaction was evaluated by infrared (IR) technique. IR analysis of bacterial biomass revealed the presence of amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl, and carbonyl groups, which are responsible for biosorption of Cd(II) and Zn (II). The maximum biosorption capacities for Cd(II) and Zn(II) biosorption by N. commune calculated from Langmuir biosorption isotherm were 126.32 and 115.41 mg/ g, respectively. The biosorption isotherm for two biosorbents fitted well with Freundlich isotherm than Langmuir model with correlation coefficient (r 2 < 0.99).The biosorption kinetic data were fitted well with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Thus, this study indicated that the N. commune is an efficient biosorbent for the removal of Cd(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solutions.

show abstract

Biosorptive capacity of Cd(II) and Cu(II) by lyophilized cells of Pseudomonas stutzeri

Cited by 66 publications

References 23 publications

Bacteria and Fungi as Alternatives for Remediation of Water Resources Polluting Heavy Metals

Bacteria and Fungi as Alternatives for Remediation of Water Resources Polluting Heavy Metals

Composting and Bioremediation Potential of Thermophiles

Biosorption of Cd(II) and Zn(II) by Nostoc commune: Isotherm and Kinetics Studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About