1993
DOI: 10.1006/cres.1993.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biostrafigraphie et faunes d'ammonites du Cénomanien et du Turonien inférieur dans le sud-est de la France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the morphologies of F. catinus and F. pachydiscoides seem easily distinguishable, which is why we have opted to maintain their specific division, agreeing with Santamaría-Zabala (1991. On the other hand, the ammonites assigned by Thomel (1992) to his new subspecies F. catinus niciensis seem to be evolute and compressed specimens of F. pachydiscoides. The small or almost non-existent depression of the whorl, quite uncommon within the members of the genus Fagesia Pervinquière, 1907, and the evolute coiling allows for identification of this species.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the morphologies of F. catinus and F. pachydiscoides seem easily distinguishable, which is why we have opted to maintain their specific division, agreeing with Santamaría-Zabala (1991. On the other hand, the ammonites assigned by Thomel (1992) to his new subspecies F. catinus niciensis seem to be evolute and compressed specimens of F. pachydiscoides. The small or almost non-existent depression of the whorl, quite uncommon within the members of the genus Fagesia Pervinquière, 1907, and the evolute coiling allows for identification of this species.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Different paleontological studies have been dedicated to the fossil-rich Barremian deposits cropping out near Saint Laurent (Bert and Delanoy, 2000;Bert, Delanoy, & Bersac, 2006;Delanoy, 1990Delanoy, , 1992Delanoy, Magnin, Selebran, & Selebran, 1991). The Upper Cretaceous succession of the Col de Braus section was also the subject of detailed biostratigraphic analyses of planktonicforaminifera and calcareous nannofossils (Conard, 1978;Conard & Manivit, 1979), palynofacies (Götz, Feist-Burkhardt, & Ruckwied, 2008), and ammonites (Thomel, 1992).…”
Section: Geohistorical and Scientific Significance Of The Col De Braumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interval shows important lateral variations: at Saint Laurent it is represented by a 40-50 cm-thick bioclastic-lithoclastic conglomerate bed, followed by a 15-20 cm-thick bed of glauconitic limestone; in the eastern and southern sectors (Albaretta, Vallon du Parais) it reduces to a centimetre-thick bioclastic-lithoclastic lag resting on HG2. Thomel, 1992;Thomel & Lanteaume, 1967) In the western sector, this unit starts with a 8-10-metre-thick alternation of glaucony-rich dark marls and marly limestones, with ammonites (Lithancylus sp.) and nautiloids (Paracymatoceras sp.).…”
Section: Lower Cretaceous Successionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For more than a century, the Turonian of south-eastern France has been the subject of numerous studies that outlined the occurrence of significant ammonoid fauna (ROMAN, 1912;ROMAN & MAZERAN, 1913;FARAUD, 1934FARAUD, , 1936FARAUD, , 1940FARAUD, , 1951SORNAY, 1939SORNAY, , 1946SORNAY, , 1950SORNAY, , 1964MENNESSIER, 1950;LETOURNEUR & PORTHAULT, 1966;THOMEL, 1969THOMEL, , 1992THOMEL, , 1993PORTHAULT, 1974;AMÉDRO et al, 1983;DEVALQUE et al, 1983;KENNEDY, 1994;JOLET et al, 2001;DIE-BOLD, 2012;ROBASZYNSKI et al, 2014;DIEBOLD et al, 2018) and allowed the establishment of a regional biostratigraphic zonal scheme (Fig. 1) that can be used throughout western Europe (KENNEDY, 1994;ROBASZYNSKI et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%