2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-022-04159-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosurfactant Production from Pineapple Waste and Application of Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Sarachat et al [41], large volumes of drained fermented broth result in a wet foam with low biosurfactant removal as 1.00 vvm (EI 24 = 65.5%), and lower aeration rate increases the residence time of the bubbles, which move slowly up to the top to generate more dried foam and higher enrichment of biosurfactant (0.25 vvm − EI 24 = 67.6%). Santos et al [42] optimized the production of biosurfactant from B. subtilis in an orbital shaker using pineapple waste, and reported an EI 24 of 58.60 below that found in this work. Productivity reached a maximum value of 623.6 % mL h −1 after 10 h of processing, and was followed, at an inversely proportional rate, by the conversion of biomass into the product, since biomass increases with aeration as previously discussed.…”
Section: Biosurfactant Productioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…According to Sarachat et al [41], large volumes of drained fermented broth result in a wet foam with low biosurfactant removal as 1.00 vvm (EI 24 = 65.5%), and lower aeration rate increases the residence time of the bubbles, which move slowly up to the top to generate more dried foam and higher enrichment of biosurfactant (0.25 vvm − EI 24 = 67.6%). Santos et al [42] optimized the production of biosurfactant from B. subtilis in an orbital shaker using pineapple waste, and reported an EI 24 of 58.60 below that found in this work. Productivity reached a maximum value of 623.6 % mL h −1 after 10 h of processing, and was followed, at an inversely proportional rate, by the conversion of biomass into the product, since biomass increases with aeration as previously discussed.…”
Section: Biosurfactant Productioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…They are distinctive secondary metabolites, produced non-ribosomal by certain bacteria, fungi (Ndlovu et al, 2017). They are either integrated into the cell membrane or released extracellularly (El-Shahed et al, 2022;Santos et al, 2023). The amphiphilic structure of a surfactant, consists of a hydrophobic moiety which is either a long-chain fatty-acid, α-alkyl-β-hydroxy fatty acid or hydroxyl fatty acid and the hydrophilic moiety can be a carbohydrate, a peptide, an amino acid, a phosphate group, a carboxylic acid, or alcohol, among others (Rufino et al, 2008;Mandal et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%