2011
DOI: 10.1021/op200085k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotechnological Development of a Practical Synthesis of Ethyl (S)-2-Ethoxy-3-(p-methoxyphenyl)propanoate (EEHP): Over 100-Fold Productivity Increase from Yeast Whole Cells to Recombinant Isolated Enzymes

Abstract: The coupling of the enantioselective reduction catalyzed by Old Yellow Enzymes (OYEs), together with the in situ substrate feeding product removal (SFPR) concept, significantly improved the productivity of the g-scale preparation of ethyl (S)-2-ethoxy-3-(p-methoxyphenyl)propanoate (EEHP), an important precursor of several PPAR-α/γ agonists, such as Tesaglitazar. The OYEs and the glucose dehydrogenase for cofactor regeneration were cloned, overexpressed in Escherichia coli, and purified. The synthetic sequence … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, ER-catalyzed reactions are performed at 5 mM substrate concentration since these enzymes are plagued by substrate and/or product inhibition [24,65,66]. The implementation of an in situ substrate feeding product removal (SFPR) technology was successfully applied to the OYE-catalyzed reaction of highly enantiopure ethyl (S)-2-ethoxy-3-(p-methoxyphenyl)propanoate (EEHP; 29c), an important precursor of several PPAR-α/γ agonists, like tesaglitazar [65,67]. SFPR works on the adsorption of substrate and products on a hydrophobic resin, maintaining soluble concentrations at levels that are not toxic for the microorganism or enzyme.…”
Section: Improvements Of Productivity Stereoselectivity And/or Convmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, ER-catalyzed reactions are performed at 5 mM substrate concentration since these enzymes are plagued by substrate and/or product inhibition [24,65,66]. The implementation of an in situ substrate feeding product removal (SFPR) technology was successfully applied to the OYE-catalyzed reaction of highly enantiopure ethyl (S)-2-ethoxy-3-(p-methoxyphenyl)propanoate (EEHP; 29c), an important precursor of several PPAR-α/γ agonists, like tesaglitazar [65,67]. SFPR works on the adsorption of substrate and products on a hydrophobic resin, maintaining soluble concentrations at levels that are not toxic for the microorganism or enzyme.…”
Section: Improvements Of Productivity Stereoselectivity And/or Convmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17), where hydride delivery on Cβ is sterically impeded (compare with Section 2.5). In turn, this leads to two competing reactions, i.e.…”
Section: Nitro-group Reduction: Nitroalkenes (Oxazete Formation)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique allowed elevated substrate loading and gave a productivity of 56 g L −1 d −1 on the preparative scale. 17 The use of ene-reductases on a large scale was also reported for the reduction of citraconic acid dimethyl ester. The reaction was successfully scaled up to 70 g in a biphasic system, using cell paste containing the biocatalyst, in conjunction with a coupled-enzyme recycling system based on i-propanol and carbonyl reductase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…All the enzymes employed were overexpressed in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) strains harbouring a specific plasmid prepared according to standard molecular biology techniques: pET30a-OYE1 from the original plasmid kindly provided by Neil C. Bruce, [15] pET30a-OYE2 and pET30a-OYE3 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 and pKTS-GDH from Bacillus megaterium DSM509 (detailed steps reported in ref. [16] ).…”
Section: Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%