2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2020.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotic and abiotic factors influencing the prevalence, intensity and distribution of Eucoleus aerophilus and Crenosoma vulpis in red foxes, Vulpes vulpes from Romania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, only C. vulpis was morphologically identified in red foxes from Romania (52), and is now morphologically and molecularly confirmed in two mustelid species, M. martes and M. foina. In red foxes, the abundance of C. vulpis has a strong positive relationship with the presence of wetlands, and environmental factors mostly act on the intermediate hosts, regulating the distribution pattern (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previously, only C. vulpis was morphologically identified in red foxes from Romania (52), and is now morphologically and molecularly confirmed in two mustelid species, M. martes and M. foina. In red foxes, the abundance of C. vulpis has a strong positive relationship with the presence of wetlands, and environmental factors mostly act on the intermediate hosts, regulating the distribution pattern (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The host and environmental factors influencing parasitic abundance were evaluated by mean of a Generalised Linear Model (GLM), with Poisson distribution family. Attending to the home range of the fox ( Deak et al, 2020 ), environmental variables were calculated for a 1 km buffer (400 ha) from the geographic location of origin of each individual using QGIS (3.16.11) software ( QGIS Development Team, 2021 ). The environmental variables were grouped into three categories: climatic variables, spectral index and land uses ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, individuals with high body mass can harbor more parasites since a larger habitat favor parasite colonization, while individuals with low body condition can exhibit reduced immune competence related to nutrients deficiency and an increase in parasitosis (Wilson et al, 2002;Morand, 2015). In addition, environmental characteristics that influence parasitic infections include altitude, climate (e.g., temperature, humidity), habitat quality, among others (Wells et al, 2007;Barelli et al, 2021;Deak et al, 2020;Kiene et al, 2021). Effects of helminths and protozoa infections on rodents living in human-modified habitats can be intensified with detrimental impact at host population scale (Santicchia et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%