Biotic and abiotic stresses of cool season food legumes in the western hemisphere

Slinkhard, A. E.; Bascur, G; Hernandez-Bravo, G.

doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0798-3_10

Cited by 16 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Young pea plants can withstand a little frost, though frost may damage the flowers and pods. As a winter crop, peas tolerate temperatures down to 28°F (-2°C) in the seedling stage, but top growth may be damaged when the temperature falls below 21°F (-6°C) Slinkard et al (1994). Also, increasing the relative humidity from 70 to 90 per cent at 20 °C increased dry weight of (mainly leaves and stems), and shoot numbers of wheat plant by 20-30 per cent Margaret et al (1974) This confirms the results obtained by Sharma et.…”

Section: Plant Growth Effect Of Sowing Datessupporting

confidence: 71%

Effect of Sowing Dates, Irrigation Intervals and Organic Fertilizers on Growth and Productivity of Pea Plants (Pisum sativum L.) under Sandy Soil Conditions

El-kasem

El-Kassas

2017

Journal of Plant Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two field experiments were conducted during winter seasons of 2014-15 and 2015-16 at the Agric. Res. Station, Veg. Res. Dept., Hort. Res. Inst., Agric. Res. Center, in El-Arish, North Sinai Governorate, Egypt. The aim of this investigation to study the effect of two sowing dates (15 th October., and 15 th November), two irrigation treatments (100% for water requirements for pea , which is 2100 m 3 distributed through the growth stage to irrigation every day and irrigated every two days by half of these requirements) and five fertilization treatments (100% NPK from recommended dose as control, Cow manure, and Compost at rates of 10 and 20 m 3 per fed. from each) on Sementi Pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivar growth and yield under sandy soil condition with drip irrigation system. The treatments were arranged randomly in a split-split -plot design, in three replications where the two sowing dates were randomly arranged in the main plots, two irrigation intervals were randomly distributed in sub plots., and five fertilization treatments were allotted in sub sub plots. The results showed that the highest values of all growth parameters; i.e., plant height, number of branches, number of leaves as well as the fresh and dry weight of pea plants, recorded at the first sowing date (15 th October) and irrigation every day with addition of compost at the rate of 20 m 3 or 10 m 3 per fed. Followed by sowing in the same date and the irrigation every two days with addition of compost at the rate of 20 m 3 per fed. The results indicated that the first sowing date (15 th October) of pea plants with irrigation every day or every two days and adding organic fertilizer from compost at the rate of 20 m 3 per fed recorded the highest values of number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, pod length, and yield per plant as well as total yield per fed. Followed by planting in the same date with irrigation every day and adding of compost fertilization at the rate of 10 m 3 per fed. Also, the results showed that the highest values for leaf content of photosynthetic pigments as well as the seed content of N P K and protein were obtained from sowing on 15 th October and irrigation each day with adding compost fertilizer at the rate of 20 and 10 m 3 / fed. Followed by sowing on the same date with irrigation every two days and adding 20 m 3 of compost /fed. Regard to the water relations, resulted indicated that, irrigation of pea plants every two days during the different stages of growth reduced the total yield by 17.29 -17.06 % , and saving about 2.86 -3.09 % of (IWR) in the two growing seasons, respectively. In addition, increasing all investigated organic fertilizer rates with lowering of amount water irrigation led to water saving more than 24%. Among these results, it is clear that the highest value of water use efficiency (5.96 and 6.40 kg/m -3 ) in the first and second season, respectively was obtained with application of the doubled amount compost ( 20 m 3 per fed.) with irrigation every two days under sandy soil condition in Nort...

show abstract

Section: Plant Growth Effect Of Sowing Datessupporting

confidence: 71%

Effect of Sowing Dates, Irrigation Intervals and Organic Fertilizers on Growth and Productivity of Pea Plants (Pisum sativum L.) under Sandy Soil Conditions

El-kasem

El-Kassas

2017

Journal of Plant Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…, 1974; Hirano & Upper, 2000). Slinkard et al. (1994) found that the threshold temperatures for pea were −2°C (plants able to thrive without appreciable damage) and −6°C (significant yield decrease).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae in a collection of pea germplasm under field and controlled conditions

2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A total of 242 Pisum accessions were screened for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi under controlled conditions. Resistance was found to all races, including race 6 and the recently described race 8. Fifty-eight accessions were further tested for resistance to P. syringae pv. syringae under controlled conditions, with some highly resistant accessions identified. Finally, a set of 41 accessions were evaluated for resistance to P. syringae pv. pisi and pv. syringae under spring-and winter-sowing field conditions. R2, R3 and R4 race-specific resistance genes to P. syringae pv. pisi protected pea plants in the field. Resistance sources to race 6 identified under controlled conditions were ineffective in the field. Frost effects were also evaluated in relation to disease response. Results strongly suggest that frost tolerance is effective in lowering the disease effects caused by P. syringae pv. pisi and pv. syringae under frost-stress conditions, even in the absence of disease resistance genes, although the highest degree of this protection is reached when frost tolerance and disease-resistance genes are combined in the same genetic background.

show abstract

“…Resistance to lentil rust is inherited monogenically with resistance dominant to susceptibility (Erskine et al, 1994). The identified resistances have been introduced to adapted cultivars (Slinkhard et al, 1994).…”

Section: Sources Of Resistancementioning

confidence: 99%

Screening techniques and sources of resistance to rusts and mildews in grain legumes

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biotic and abiotic stresses of cool season food legumes in the western hemisphere

Cited by 16 publications

References 8 publications

Effect of Sowing Dates, Irrigation Intervals and Organic Fertilizers on Growth and Productivity of Pea Plants (Pisum sativum L.) under Sandy Soil Conditions

Effect of Sowing Dates, Irrigation Intervals and Organic Fertilizers on Growth and Productivity of Pea Plants (Pisum sativum L.) under Sandy Soil Conditions

Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae in a collection of pea germplasm under field and controlled conditions

Screening techniques and sources of resistance to rusts and mildews in grain legumes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About